From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] of: dynamic: Refactor action prints to not use "%pOF" inside devtree_lock
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 19:38:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202307291901.IEr9LCpd-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728231950.1619073-1-robh@kernel.org>
Hi Rob,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.5-rc3 next-20230728]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Rob-Herring/of-dynamic-Refactor-action-prints-to-not-use-pOF-inside-devtree_lock/20230729-072155
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728231950.1619073-1-robh%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v3] of: dynamic: Refactor action prints to not use "%pOF" inside devtree_lock
config: i386-randconfig-i014-20230728 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307291901.IEr9LCpd-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307291901.IEr9LCpd-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307291901.IEr9LCpd-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/of/dynamic.c:74:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'of_changeset_action_print' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void of_changeset_action_print(unsigned long action, struct device_node *np, const char *prop_name)
^
drivers/of/dynamic.c:74:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
void of_changeset_action_print(unsigned long action, struct device_node *np, const char *prop_name)
^
static
>> drivers/of/dynamic.c:87:6: error: expected expression
if (pr_debug("notify "))
^
include/linux/printk.h:579:2: note: expanded from macro 'pr_debug'
dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
^
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:267:2: note: expanded from macro 'dynamic_pr_debug'
_dynamic_func_call(fmt, __dynamic_pr_debug, \
^
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:248:2: note: expanded from macro '_dynamic_func_call'
_dynamic_func_call_cls(_DPRINTK_CLASS_DFLT, fmt, func, ##__VA_ARGS__)
^
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:246:2: note: expanded from macro '_dynamic_func_call_cls'
__dynamic_func_call_cls(__UNIQUE_ID(ddebug), cls, fmt, func, ##__VA_ARGS__)
^
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:219:58: note: expanded from macro '__dynamic_func_call_cls'
#define __dynamic_func_call_cls(id, cls, fmt, func, ...) do { \
^
drivers/of/dynamic.c:571:6: error: expected expression
if (pr_debug("changeset: applying: cset<%p> ", ce))
^
include/linux/printk.h:579:2: note: expanded from macro 'pr_debug'
dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
^
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:267:2: note: expanded from macro 'dynamic_pr_debug'
_dynamic_func_call(fmt, __dynamic_pr_debug, \
^
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:248:2: note: expanded from macro '_dynamic_func_call'
_dynamic_func_call_cls(_DPRINTK_CLASS_DFLT, fmt, func, ##__VA_ARGS__)
^
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:246:2: note: expanded from macro '_dynamic_func_call_cls'
__dynamic_func_call_cls(__UNIQUE_ID(ddebug), cls, fmt, func, ##__VA_ARGS__)
^
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:219:58: note: expanded from macro '__dynamic_func_call_cls'
#define __dynamic_func_call_cls(id, cls, fmt, func, ...) do { \
^
1 warning and 2 errors generated.
vim +87 drivers/of/dynamic.c
81
82 int of_reconfig_notify(unsigned long action, struct of_reconfig_data *p)
83 {
84 int rc;
85 struct of_reconfig_data *pr = p;
86
> 87 if (pr_debug("notify "))
88 of_changeset_action_print(action, pr->dn, pr->prop ? pr->prop->name : NULL);
89
90 rc = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&of_reconfig_chain, action, p);
91 return notifier_to_errno(rc);
92 }
93
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-29 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-28 23:19 [PATCH v3] of: dynamic: Refactor action prints to not use "%pOF" inside devtree_lock Rob Herring
2023-07-29 3:03 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-29 6:19 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-29 11:38 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202307291901.IEr9LCpd-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).