Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] media: platform: mediatek: isp_30: add mediatek ISP3.0 sensor interface

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 04:50:05PM +0200, Julien Stephan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 01:02:02PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > Il 30/06/23 12:01, Julien Stephan ha scritto:
> ..snip..
> > > +
> > > +static const struct mtk_seninf_format_info mtk_seninf_formats[] = {
> > > +	{
> > > +		.code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR8_1X8,
> > > +		.flags = MTK_SENINF_FORMAT_BAYER,
> >
> > Each entry fits in one line.
> >
> > 	{ .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR8_1X8, .flags = MTK_SENINF_FORMAT_BAYER },
> >
> 
> Hi Angelo,
> 
> Actually not all entries fit in one line. The last 4 ones don't:
> 
>        { .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_DPCM8_1X8, .flags = MTK_SENINF_FORMAT_DPCM | MTK_SENINF_FORMAT_INPUT_ONLY },
> which is 115 chars..
> 
> so what is the best? put all in one line except the last 4 one? or keep
> them all as is?

I'd keep them all as is.

> > > +	}, {
> ..snip..
> > > +	udelay(1);
> > > +	mtk_seninf_input_update(input, SENINF_CTRL, CSI2_SW_RST, 0);
> >
> > Is there any way to check if the CSI port did reset, or is it *guaranteed* to get
> > out of reset in a microsecond after deasserting SW_RST?
> 
> I will double check this
> 
> > > +}
> > > +
> ..snip..
> > > +
> > > +	val = mtk_seninf_mux_read(mux, SENINF_MUX_CTRL);
> >
> > rst_mask = SENINF_MUX_CTRL_SENINF_IRQ_SW_RST | SENINF_MUX_CTRL_SENINF_MUX_SW_RST;
> >
> > writel(mux->base + SENINF_MUX_CTRL, val | rst_mask);
> > writel(mux->base + SENINFMUX_CTRL, val & ~rst_mask);
> >
> > that's better, right? :-)

With mtk_seninf_mux_write() instead of writel(), yes :-)

> right :)
> 
> > > +	mtk_seninf_mux_write(mux, SENINF_MUX_CTRL, val |
> > > +			     SENINF_MUX_CTRL_SENINF_IRQ_SW_RST |
> > > +			     SENINF_MUX_CTRL_SENINF_MUX_SW_RST);

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart