From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Thippeswamy Havalige <thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, bharat.kumar.gogada@amd.com,
michal.simek@amd.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: xilinx-nwl: Remove unnecessary code which updates primary,secondary and sub-ordinate bus numbers.
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 10:56:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230808155638.GA313716@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230808103733.93707-1-thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com>
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 04:07:30PM +0530, Thippeswamy Havalige wrote:
> The primary,secondary and sub-ordinate bus number registers are updated by
> Linux PCI core, so remove code which updates repective fields of type 1
> header 18th offset of Root Port configuration space.
Whoever applies this, please:
- Drop period from subject line
- Add space after comma
- s/repective/respective/
- Fix up "18th"; I suppose this refers to the 18h offset, but the
reference is too low-level and probably unnecessary since we
already listed the affected registers
> Signed-off-by: Thippeswamy Havalige <thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@amd.com>
> ---
> changes in v2:
> - Code increasing ECAM Size value is added into a seperate patch.
> - Modified commit messages.
> changes in v1:
> - Modified commit messages.
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c | 16 ++--------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> index 176686b..a73554e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> @@ -165,8 +165,6 @@ struct nwl_pcie {
> u32 ecam_size;
> int irq_intx;
> int irq_misc;
> - u32 ecam_value;
The removal of "ecam_value" has nothing to do with the PCI core; it
seems more related to the NWL_ECAM_VALUE_DEFAULT change, and I would
either squash it into that patch or make it a separate "no functional
change" cleanup patch.
> - u8 last_busno;
> struct nwl_msi msi;
> struct irq_domain *legacy_irq_domain;
> struct clk *clk;
> @@ -625,7 +623,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_bridge_init(struct nwl_pcie *pcie)
> {
> struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> - u32 breg_val, ecam_val, first_busno = 0;
> + u32 breg_val, ecam_val;
> int err;
>
> breg_val = nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, E_BREG_CAPABILITIES) & BREG_PRESENT;
> @@ -675,7 +673,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_bridge_init(struct nwl_pcie *pcie)
> E_ECAM_CR_ENABLE, E_ECAM_CONTROL);
>
> nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, E_ECAM_CONTROL) |
> - (pcie->ecam_value << E_ECAM_SIZE_SHIFT),
> + (NWL_ECAM_VALUE_DEFAULT << E_ECAM_SIZE_SHIFT),
> E_ECAM_CONTROL);
>
> nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, lower_32_bits(pcie->phys_ecam_base),
> @@ -683,15 +681,6 @@ static int nwl_pcie_bridge_init(struct nwl_pcie *pcie)
> nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, upper_32_bits(pcie->phys_ecam_base),
> E_ECAM_BASE_HI);
>
> - /* Get bus range */
> - ecam_val = nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, E_ECAM_CONTROL);
> - pcie->last_busno = (ecam_val & E_ECAM_SIZE_LOC) >> E_ECAM_SIZE_SHIFT;
> - /* Write primary, secondary and subordinate bus numbers */
> - ecam_val = first_busno;
> - ecam_val |= (first_busno + 1) << 8;
> - ecam_val |= (pcie->last_busno << E_ECAM_SIZE_SHIFT);
> - writel(ecam_val, (pcie->ecam_base + PCI_PRIMARY_BUS));
> -
> if (nwl_pcie_link_up(pcie))
> dev_info(dev, "Link is UP\n");
> else
> @@ -792,7 +781,6 @@ static int nwl_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge);
>
> pcie->dev = dev;
> - pcie->ecam_value = NWL_ECAM_VALUE_DEFAULT;
>
> err = nwl_pcie_parse_dt(pcie, pdev);
> if (err) {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-08 10:37 [PATCH v2] PCI: xilinx-nwl: Remove unnecessary code which updates primary,secondary and sub-ordinate bus numbers Thippeswamy Havalige
2023-08-08 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Increase ecam size value to discover 256 buses during Thippeswamy Havalige
2023-08-08 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-nwl: Modify ECAM size in example Thippeswamy Havalige
2023-08-08 17:16 ` Hugo Villeneuve
2023-08-08 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: xilinx-nwl: Increase ECAM size to accommodate 256 buses Thippeswamy Havalige
2023-08-08 15:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-08 15:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230808155638.GA313716@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bharat.kumar.gogada@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).