devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for AM62P5 SoCs
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 10:55:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230813-sleek-trash-16ea454e2640@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810184308.q67ldarld6qwo5uq@erased>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2060 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 01:43:08PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 17:03-20230810, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 10:23:12AM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> > > From: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > Add bindings for TI's AM62P5 family of devices.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml | 6 ++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> > > index 5ca6af492507..93b2774cc0a9 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> > > @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ properties:
> > >                - ti,am62a7-sk
> > >            - const: ti,am62a7
> > >  
> > > +      - description: K3 AM62P5 SoC
> > 
> > SoC seems a bit off here, since the sk is actually a board using the
> > SoC, but it seems to be the convention for TI stuff,
> 
> Thanks for providing that perspective - there will be new boards
> getting added to the enum list, they should be one line additions at
> this point.
> 
> But, your point taken. K3 AM625P SoC based boards is more appropriate.
> 
> I can do the local change as I apply and keep your ack unless you
> object.

Oh totally no objection, "xyz SoC based boards" is what most people seem
to use.

> 
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > +        items:
> > > +          - enum:
> > > +              - ti,am62p5-sk
> > > +          - const: ti,am62p5
> > > +
> > >        - description: K3 AM625 SoC PHYTEC phyBOARD-Lyra
> > >          items:
> > >            - const: phytec,am625-phyboard-lyra-rdk
> > > -- 
> > > 2.41.0
> > > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon
> Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-13  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-10  4:53 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: dts: ti: Introduce AM62P SoCs Vignesh Raghavendra
2023-08-10  4:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for AM62P5 SoCs Vignesh Raghavendra
2023-08-10  5:19   ` Rob Herring
2023-08-10 16:03   ` Conor Dooley
2023-08-10 18:43     ` Nishanth Menon
2023-08-13  9:55       ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-08-13 13:06         ` Nishanth Menon
2023-08-10  4:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: ti: Introduce AM62P5 family of SoCs Vignesh Raghavendra
2023-08-10 21:11   ` Andrew Davis
2023-08-14 19:21   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-08-10  4:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: ti: Add support for the AM62P5-SK Vignesh Raghavendra
2023-08-10 21:19   ` Andrew Davis
2023-08-11 15:25     ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2023-08-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 0/3] arm64: dts: ti: Introduce AM62P SoCs Dhruva Gole
2023-08-10 18:46 ` Nishanth Menon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230813-sleek-trash-16ea454e2640@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).