From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6688AC0015E for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 03:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234007AbjHODxY (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2023 23:53:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39344 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234641AbjHODwA (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2023 23:52:00 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407E2183; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 20:51:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1692071513; x=1723607513; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0U5mVMBc7pOFHVeJVlzVG7Zb1up3kpgr5XH1w5CKdFQ=; b=dJkIDYvZh2RWfJfpff76A3EB7lQDox3PLknJmHZlVZN3QworAVkgi0m4 FNfcN2lQ5Y7YAjQri0OTa7Iu8aBrG6bCa0YoMqcXa/F7z7gOf9UYekceY pZUWCK7KgzBTKfzwKhlTKxofXtgVUrPd0ENVpPfDO/jusgfjhKj1gDZZ3 /yW3l0exBOzC9QVGaR1y9rKzWi1bvPJY7PDmCbpVKi6kg6D+VgPikiywn FPvGXMWBbKeO1wNDqt6HzGjoGxHhMxXz6W55xooMH6GXe1bj55zW3JJly Aabs/WlZM8dczck+HK8Tn7YHDIXSu264Ued9sX/KQO3ruMOoVr2D5WetK A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10802"; a="403176407" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,173,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="403176407" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Aug 2023 20:51:52 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10802"; a="847904364" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,173,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="847904364" Received: from pglc00067.png.intel.com ([10.221.207.87]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2023 20:51:48 -0700 From: Rohan G Thomas To: Jose Abreu Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, kuba@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, Rohan G Thomas Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: stmmac: Tx coe sw fallback Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 11:51:45 +0800 Message-Id: <20230815035145.16990-1-rohan.g.thomas@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.0 In-Reply-To: <20230814181354.8603-1-rohan.g.thomas@intel.com> References: <20230814181354.8603-1-rohan.g.thomas@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: Rohan G Thomas Date: Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 15:06:37 > > > + bool tx_q_coe_lmt; > > > > Please use a flag here instead of "tx_q_coe_lmt". This is the > > preferrable method now. > > > > Thanks, > > Jose > > Thanks Jose for the feedback. If I read that correctly, your suggestion is to > change " tx_q_coe_lmt" to something more readable, like "has_txcoe_limit". > Please correct me if I understand it wrongly. > > BR, > Rohan > Or, use int instead of bool? BR, Rohan