From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F110312B80 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 20:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71741194; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 13:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bffa8578feso4375121fa.2; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 13:55:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1694897749; x=1695502549; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=OtXy98myC9Xeki202X9z45U3TYQHZBLtWJzwGTAcxHE=; b=lqaMUcTF/w2pd8V7QfC5ZyBCt2sokvGp4sOH9SFAW+nlrw1H1tvWa+Kr3z7C8vrOv1 MnImkk8Stx+dBh16eBRlwerZJsoeyBwaGeF/hxaZotO6Jn2Djs2cRdW3lXnuDLSbTWK3 /KJeuQHT/n317fdWWZrs4ex6fvBiemMgIulaEOcJG9RV2LWkPCjdEtyvEiTO6Hs0/Drf bELoY5ha5Xj2w/29/pFxCkZaLZMk3HkBXH9gonkISdtKhwAA/Xj05i5ZzxmB36zoDO+E Q1nS0Wz87fzTSQjOw1u5PBxSaxECseoWiC85qN2VnDkNShtB4l2PENm2+bVjxIpQfQFz NXuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694897749; x=1695502549; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OtXy98myC9Xeki202X9z45U3TYQHZBLtWJzwGTAcxHE=; b=mLNr39E4ssQOCnL+V0J9AaeM+m+96kuEIdHC5aS2H82IuVVaUhxFSeL48D1EiGWzNT C74qz07Ofyz0VlSaMfDdAgGJjBSOji/MqE+Pz+nMUpzJps6oYRDQ7Q672xahMh6OK7sL kxZPa31B7+4EFtPV97KbuInXq+AWpTESecqMHkeLJo221IBKpB+zV9zsUgeYFWAEMAh3 QRlqhAwnl7+xofUhkURHeZ2ZaIIQJ7lJb2cEWtl69m7IHim9lBwX6u9p8T6ArU79A0W1 wo8ObbUosPrQsNF8Sl2QgV7LAnP47VRfX+EqlLdQc1zg996I7YX7DnwvKZkDLxVQ1Kgi d36A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyeZqXQWGJklCUUuXUTXUKy0KCu0RnbyW473nlFMYDLXzrFPUBQ 4Y089Xdhx6EU/gS7CVCQJmc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHLF2BDHMY5EQ2cLRGY88cc4GRtF1HNeGRvKmupJtgipgh1Tp2VYUmzRaB1Rid1OduuxyxRJA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2fc:b0:4f8:77db:1d9e with SMTP id m28-20020a05651202fc00b004f877db1d9emr4255346lfq.12.1694897749352; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 13:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([78.37.168.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id br19-20020a056512401300b00502fd9110ffsm454504lfb.294.2023.09.16.13.55.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 16 Sep 2023 13:55:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Ivan Bornyakov To: sebastian.fricke@collabora.com Cc: Ivan Bornyakov , bob.beckett@collabora.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, jackson.lee@chipsnmedia.com, kernel@collabora.com, kernel@pengutronix.de, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org, nas.chung@chipsnmedia.com, nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 5/7] media: chips-media: wave5: Add the v4l2 layer Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 23:55:40 +0300 Message-ID: <20230916205542.9410-1-brnkv.i1@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20230915-wave5_v12_on_media_master-v12-5-92fc66cd685d@collabora.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Hi, Sebastian, On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 23:11:34 +0200, Sebastian Fricke wrote: > From: Nas Chung > > Add the decoder and encoder implementing the v4l2 > API. This patch also adds the Makefile and the VIDEO_WAVE_VPU config > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Fricke > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dufresne > Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett > Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld > Signed-off-by: Nas Chung [...] > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..a13d968f5d04 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c [...] > +static void wave5_vpu_get_interrupt_for_inst(struct vpu_instance *inst, u32 status) > +{ > + struct vpu_device *dev = inst->dev; > + u32 seq_done; > + u32 cmd_done; > + int val; > + > + seq_done = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_RET_SEQ_DONE_INSTANCE_INFO); > + cmd_done = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_RET_QUEUE_CMD_DONE_INST); > + > + if (status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_INIT_SEQ)) { > + if (seq_done & BIT(inst->id)) { > + seq_done &= ~BIT(inst->id); > + wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_RET_SEQ_DONE_INSTANCE_INFO, seq_done); > + val = BIT(INT_WAVE5_INIT_SEQ); > + kfifo_in(&inst->irq_status, &val, sizeof(int)); > + } > + } > + if (status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_SET_PARAM)) { > + if (seq_done & BIT(inst->id)) { > + seq_done &= ~BIT(inst->id); > + wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_RET_SEQ_DONE_INSTANCE_INFO, seq_done); > + val = BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_SET_PARAM); > + kfifo_in(&inst->irq_status, &val, sizeof(int)); > + } > + } > + if (status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_DEC_PIC) || > + status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_PIC)) { > + if (cmd_done & BIT(inst->id)) { > + cmd_done &= ~BIT(inst->id); > + wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_RET_QUEUE_CMD_DONE_INST, cmd_done); > + val = BIT(INT_WAVE5_DEC_PIC); > + kfifo_in(&inst->irq_status, &val, sizeof(int)); > + } > + } > +} > + > +static irqreturn_t wave5_vpu_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) > +{ > + struct vpu_device *dev = dev_id; > + > + if (wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_VPU_VPU_INT_STS)) { > + struct vpu_instance *inst; > + u32 irq_status = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_REASON); > + > + list_for_each_entry(inst, &dev->instances, list) { > + wave5_vpu_get_interrupt_for_inst(inst, irq_status); > + } > + > + wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_REASON_CLR, irq_status); > + wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_CLEAR, 0x1); > + > + return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; > + } > + > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > +} > + > +static irqreturn_t wave5_vpu_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id) > +{ > + struct vpu_device *dev = dev_id; > + struct vpu_instance *inst; > + int irq_status, ret; > + > + list_for_each_entry(inst, &dev->instances, list) { > + while (kfifo_len(&inst->irq_status)) { > + ret = kfifo_out(&inst->irq_status, &irq_status, sizeof(int)); > + if (!ret) > + break; > + > + if (irq_status == BIT(INT_WAVE5_INIT_SEQ) || > + irq_status == BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_SET_PARAM)) > + complete(&inst->irq_done); > + else /* DEC/ENC_PIC */ > + inst->ops->finish_process(inst); > + > + wave5_vpu_clear_interrupt(inst, irq_status); > + } > + } > + > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > +} I believe, instead of wave5_vpu_irq() + wave5_vpu_get_interrupt_for_inst() + wave5_vpu_irq_thread() you can reduce interrupt handling to only threaded part with something like this: static irqreturn_t wave5_vpu_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id) { u32 irq_status, seq_done, cmd_done; struct vpu_device *dev = dev_id; struct vpu_instance *inst; while (wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_VPU_VPU_INT_STS)) { irq_status = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_REASON); seq_done = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_RET_SEQ_DONE_INSTANCE_INFO); cmd_done = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev, W5_RET_QUEUE_CMD_DONE_INST); list_for_each_entry(inst, &dev->instances, list) { if (irq_status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_INIT_SEQ) || irq_status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_SET_PARAM)) { if (seq_done & BIT(inst->id)) { seq_done &= ~BIT(inst->id); wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_RET_SEQ_DONE_INSTANCE_INFO, seq_done); complete(&inst->irq_done); } } if (status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_DEC_PIC) || status & BIT(INT_WAVE5_ENC_PIC)) { if (cmd_done & BIT(inst->id)) { cmd_done &= ~BIT(inst->id); wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_RET_QUEUE_CMD_DONE_INST, cmd_done); inst->ops->finish_process(inst); } } wave5_vpu_clear_interrupt(inst, irq_status); } wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_REASON_CLR, irq_status); wave5_vdi_write_register(dev, W5_VPU_VINT_CLEAR, 0x1); } return IRQ_HANDLED; } Is it better? [...] > +static int wave5_vpu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + int ret; > + struct vpu_device *dev; > + const struct wave5_match_data *match_data; > + u32 fw_revision; > + > + match_data = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > + if (!match_data) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing device match data\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + /* physical addresses limited to 32 bits */ > + dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > + dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); dma_set_mask_and_coherent()? Also error check?