From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51E6EB641 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 13:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28234C4E688; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 13:26:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1695302818; bh=tNaMqXlX6gWQEtFXsOSS3Bt8DqFxrB36y2GWLAlRgU0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Low1o3cxRNpJ+kr+RcB2p0+vtcRmOjeEZ5P2bevbRwsunSHaR5pZWYq4IcLCu67qx L5yUgJ6BOQe+qMaRmOrojjr5ejjpeu6hbCfA+8KhjV6DM+TAqwZHlf+FR96W4No555 bUnhPQdgRsSsO3z/2lTdLtQ762ENXxcTzxEcxNjuCAbaFXvQai6TeNXh31fMv8e65G +pv/5xKBSLUhWWu+zHAr41etwjNMvAGYgEvucYu3XhnmcDoyKhyQAjfV/NGINDG8CM hoUakUFn53O7Elu03wt+RqCncdqW46+CyGoD6oKd4IYQKWW1iev+Zb24ldSjikADNv oztVuagd8RLBQ== Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:26:54 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Fabio Estevam Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: serial: mxs: Fix compatible list Message-ID: <20230921-abide-humped-e1bc12732e1c@spud> References: <20230921005258.184705-1-festevam@gmail.com> <20230921-75ba68806e21c96531ea2d70@fedora> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IcqB6TI9/rs/79Pq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --IcqB6TI9/rs/79Pq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 09:53:44AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Conor, >=20 > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 6:14=E2=80=AFAM Conor Dooley w= rote: >=20 > > Dumb question maybe, but it is not mentioned here - they are actually > > compatible devices, right? I see that they have some different match > > data in the driver (relating to some DMA erratum on the 23 seemingly), > > so it's not immediately obvious to me. >=20 > That's correct. >=20 > imx23 and imx28 are SoCs from the same family (mxs) and they share the > same AUART block, so the same programming model. Right. I wasn't sure if the erratum workaround would also work on the 28, but sounds like it does. > imx23 is the first member of this family. It had an AUART erratum. > imx28 is the second member of this family and had this erratum fixed. >=20 > This means that using: >=20 > compatible =3D "fsl,imx28-auart", "fsl,imx23-auart"; >=20 > is valid. >=20 > Would you like me to improve the commit log with the information above? Your call. Acked-by: Conor Dooley Thanks, Conor. --IcqB6TI9/rs/79Pq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZQxEngAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0nuMAP937mO9VNRWDf1l/gDGbqmC05x4T5SZgkaxd+5Z/QYBXwD/RqFy5rSwNJ4n iHPI5CivOvZwyHkf4Rxv8ZNcmMGy7QM= =+hsj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IcqB6TI9/rs/79Pq--