devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: yang tylor <tylor_yang@himax.corp-partner.google.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	jikos@kernel.org, benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	poyuan_chang@himax.corp-partner.google.com, hbarnor@chromium.org,
	"jingyliang@chromium.org" <jingyliang@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: input: Introduce Himax HID-over-SPI device
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:31:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230922-removable-footwork-f1d4d96d38dd@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGD2q_YsFdDVhE4JCmQSGMWOdpe_yzG8-CdWYPXtjeZsManvgQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1548 bytes --]

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 05:43:54PM +0800, yang tylor wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 5:22 PM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 03:56:25PM +0800, yang tylor wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:09 PM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 05:31:29PM +0800, yang tylor wrote:
> >
> > > > > The behavior of "himax,boot_time_fw_upgrade" seems not stable and
> > > > > should be removed. "himax,fw_in_flash", I use the kernel config for
> > > > > user to select.
> > > >
> > > > That seems like a bad idea, we want to be able to build one kernel that
> > > > works for all hardware at the same time.
> > > >
> > > I see, so I should take that back?
> > > I'll explain more about it.
> >
> > Are there particular ICs where the firmware would always be in flash and
> > others where it would never be? Or is this a choice made by the board or
> > system designer?
> >
> Most cases it's about the system designer's decision. But some ICs may be forced
> to use flash because of its architecture(multiple IC inside, need to
> load firmware to
> multiple IC's sram by master IC). But if there is no limitation on
> this part, most system
> designers will prefer flashless.

Forgive me if I am not understanding correctly, there are some ICs that
will need to load the firmware from flash and there are some where it
will be a decision made by the designer of the board. Is the flash part
of the IC or is it an external flash chip?

Cheers,
Conor.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-22 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-19  2:49 [PATCH V2 0/2] HID: touchscreen: add himax hid-over-spi driver Tylor Yang
2023-09-19  2:49 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: input: Introduce Himax HID-over-SPI device Tylor Yang
2023-09-19  8:41   ` Conor Dooley
     [not found]     ` <CAGD2q_anfBP78jck6AbMNtgAggjOgaB3P6dkmq9tONHP45adFA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-09-19 11:09       ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-22  7:56         ` yang tylor
2023-09-22  9:22           ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-22  9:43             ` yang tylor
2023-09-22 15:31               ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-09-25  1:44                 ` yang tylor
2023-09-25  8:41                   ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-25 10:16                     ` yang tylor
2023-09-26  9:02                       ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-26  9:52                         ` yang tylor
2023-09-26 12:53                           ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-28  2:12                             ` yang tylor
2023-09-28 16:56                               ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-02 10:44                                 ` yang tylor
2023-10-09 17:52                                   ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-12  2:30                                     ` yang tylor
2023-10-12 15:24                                       ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-13  2:15                                         ` yang tylor
2023-09-19 18:17   ` Rob Herring
2023-09-19  2:49 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] HID: touchscreen: Add initial support for Himax HID-over-SPI Tylor Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230922-removable-footwork-f1d4d96d38dd@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hbarnor@chromium.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=jingyliang@chromium.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=poyuan_chang@himax.corp-partner.google.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tylor_yang@himax.corp-partner.google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).