From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA3CA14F6F for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 09:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9BA6C433C7; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 09:22:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1695374544; bh=8S14wwxTEg2QgvNUOFowD4EjDPHWFixEfBczznYYXPc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XW6TFhEPXiHmvFQqo3vS7pKtw74KDLpUQb9ktR8RiTIqAAARktOzI8g6Gv9jRjvBh WVWdlPoHs0YehBrNpNCVyqOPhU2XPBCDH6mGPmftbCgDaD+UfDnRuUYGbWFqmuWQlH 5g22/7EaNjy74I9eJx2h4dxH6e97k1Syfcc0rhC+RWsg1Bh6ljN+SJsAsqXvffvx94 Cs74g0kZBo2sr9GMyx0hVIRsMMfmGjApL7EG6bzg8dCbPc31rqoiqHlUhGH/ugYArH iGzbjaXbIhKvYVn46qilNpmpm0qhvGyL4Jz/fu9TsFXBxWlCuuztlZaZ9aYBEu6j9Q l/VEAq7XPtC3w== Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:22:19 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: yang tylor Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org, benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, poyuan_chang@himax.corp-partner.google.com, hbarnor@chromium.org, "jingyliang@chromium.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: input: Introduce Himax HID-over-SPI device Message-ID: <20230922-unclothed-bottom-5531329f9724@spud> References: <20230919024943.3088916-1-tylor_yang@himax.corp-partner.google.com> <20230919024943.3088916-2-tylor_yang@himax.corp-partner.google.com> <20230919-70b2f1e368a8face73468dfa@fedora> <20230919-cc4646dbfb953bd34e05658c@fedora> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v+aqA+5QpEvFBWgw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --v+aqA+5QpEvFBWgw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 03:56:25PM +0800, yang tylor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:09=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley w= rote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 05:31:29PM +0800, yang tylor wrote: > > > The behavior of "himax,boot_time_fw_upgrade" seems not stable and > > > should be removed. "himax,fw_in_flash", I use the kernel config for > > > user to select. > > > > That seems like a bad idea, we want to be able to build one kernel that > > works for all hardware at the same time. > > > I see, so I should take that back? > I'll explain more about it. Are there particular ICs where the firmware would always be in flash and others where it would never be? Or is this a choice made by the board or system designer? Thanks, Conor. --v+aqA+5QpEvFBWgw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZQ1cxwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0gULAP9LWqFNeG5rHo+qgr/z06EqS5lS7F8Od2gCHSaTlCa5DAEAyyHbiPkKJrXq oII3i1N9zR8cMUB/j1LYhi1slzzKqg4= =tovU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v+aqA+5QpEvFBWgw--