From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0065653A6 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2023 13:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02FAAC433C8; Sun, 24 Sep 2023 13:31:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1695562294; bh=KveCRAs1LoJni9u7gqSBDeeyR594fRjMZ0VKUh3HuTo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tvP/kyHVcBgDcIb1swnDJNE/fOz7HjVcg/pB+d/7wJfGLwogawl5gglPb4O+t/798 cy5TCM0kdkfEJKp4ncOcPZ2TI+6D8Lyuzg34ccTRTvnGeUl+4BLke3O74PUss/8cAU fFJhpsQd91VPeDPeTtHcv6A8SC9OLFh0Bl56HC2RPFzOG4ee9fms3MVIZ/8psUpElR OtbgcZ+cDBs2JSqprUH3H4AuvJvqLdmaSHVGCiqCIUibseaAHiXcN8wQufI5Y+tdWd 5hpdvUbA/7IsjXF3pNiei/MjVtjRnKEXFP6uEhtdl4Uj6nESVfn1wldRQWJzccLecb NskgZwpbX9ICw== Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2023 14:31:26 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Jagath Jog J Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, lars@metafoo.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: imu: Add DT binding doc for BMI323 Message-ID: <20230924143126.60a142c4@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20230918080314.11959-1-jagathjog1996@gmail.com> <20230918080314.11959-2-jagathjog1996@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 22:14:40 +0530 Jagath Jog J wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, >=20 > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 5:55=E2=80=AFPM Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: > > > > On 18/09/2023 10:03, Jagath Jog J wrote: =20 > > > Add devicetree description document for Bosch BMI323, a 6-Axis IMU. = =20 > > > > I don't know why this is RFC and cover letter does not explain it. Shall > > I just ignore it? Patch is no ready? Recently at least two times someone > > was disappointed that his code marked as RFC received my review. =20 >=20 > Thank you for reviewing. This was the sensor's first patch series, > so I initially submitted it as an RFC. I will mark it as "Patch" > in the next series. Have more confidence! RFCs need to have clearly stated questions. If you don't have any then you are putting forwards driver for review in ordering to get it merged upstream - so PATCH is appropriate. As you'll see many IIO drivers go through a 'few' revisions once they are posted (hopefully not too many!) Krzysztof is great at reviewing whatever shows up, but in many cases reviewers won't look at an RFC (unless a big discussion starts) becau= se they aren't interested in open questions, just code that the author conside= rs ready. Jonathan