* [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems
@ 2023-09-28 22:21 Fabio Estevam
2023-10-02 12:27 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2023-09-28 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: daniel.lezcano
Cc: rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, robh+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm,
devicetree, Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
The number of fsl,tmu-range entries vary among the several NXP SoCs.
- lx2160a has two fsl,tmu-range entries (fsl,qoriq-tmu compatible)
- imx8mq has four fsl,tmu-range entries. (fsl,imx8mq-tmu compatible)
- imx93 has seven fsl,tmu-range entries. (fsl,qoriq-tmu compatible)
Change minItems and maxItems accordingly.
This fixes the following schema warning:
imx93-11x11-evk.dtb: tmu@44482000: fsl,tmu-range: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
[2147483866, 2147483881, 2147483906, 2147483946, 2147484006, 2147484071, 2147484086] is too long
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
---
Changes since v1:
- Adjust min/maxItems to cover all NXP SoCs.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
index ee4780f186f9..60b9d79e7543 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
@@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ properties:
description: |
The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC
reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc.
- minItems: 4
+ minItems: 2
+ maxItems: 7
fsl,tmu-calibration:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems
2023-09-28 22:21 [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems Fabio Estevam
@ 2023-10-02 12:27 ` Conor Dooley
2023-12-09 19:22 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-10-02 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Estevam
Cc: daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, robh+dt, conor+dt,
linux-pm, devicetree, Fabio Estevam
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1857 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:21:30PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
>
> The number of fsl,tmu-range entries vary among the several NXP SoCs.
>
> - lx2160a has two fsl,tmu-range entries (fsl,qoriq-tmu compatible)
> - imx8mq has four fsl,tmu-range entries. (fsl,imx8mq-tmu compatible)
> - imx93 has seven fsl,tmu-range entries. (fsl,qoriq-tmu compatible)
>
> Change minItems and maxItems accordingly.
>
> This fixes the following schema warning:
>
> imx93-11x11-evk.dtb: tmu@44482000: fsl,tmu-range: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> [2147483866, 2147483881, 2147483906, 2147483946, 2147484006, 2147484071, 2147484086] is too long
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
tbh, this seems like a situation where per compatible constraints should
be added, since each of the devices listed above has different
requirements.
Thanks,
Conor.
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Adjust min/maxItems to cover all NXP SoCs.
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> index ee4780f186f9..60b9d79e7543 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ properties:
> description: |
> The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC
> reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc.
> - minItems: 4
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 7
>
> fsl,tmu-calibration:
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
> --
> 2.34.1
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems
2023-10-02 12:27 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2023-12-09 19:22 ` Fabio Estevam
2023-12-09 20:23 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2023-12-09 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, robh+dt, conor+dt,
linux-pm, devicetree, Fabio Estevam
Hi Conor,
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:27 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> tbh, this seems like a situation where per compatible constraints should
> be added, since each of the devices listed above has different
> requirements.
Ok, I am trying to add the device constraints as suggested.
For example: I am trying to describe that imx93 has 7 items for fsl,tmu-range:
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
enum:
- fsl,qoriq-tmu
- fsl,imx8mq-tmu
+ - fsl,imx93-tmu
reg:
maxItems: 1
@@ -33,7 +34,15 @@ properties:
description: |
The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC
reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc.
- maxItems: 4
+ items:
+ - description: TTR0CR
+ - description: TTR1CR
+ - description: TTR2CR
+ - description: TTR3CR
+ - description: TTR4CR
+ - description: TTR5CR
+ - description: TTR6CR
+ minItems: 4
fsl,tmu-calibration:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
@@ -69,15 +78,33 @@ required:
- fsl,tmu-calibration
- '#thermal-sensor-cells'
+
+allOf:
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - fsl,imx93-tmu
+ then:
+ properties:
+ fsl,tmu-range:
+ minItems: 7
+ maxItems: 7
+ else:
+ properties:
+ fsl,tmu-range:
+ maxItems: 4
+
additionalProperties: false
examples:
- |
tmu@f0000 {
- compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu";
reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <18 2 0 0>;
- fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a>;
+ fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0 0>;
fsl,tmu-calibration = <0x00000000 0x00000025>,
<0x00000001 0x00000028>,
<0x00000002 0x0000002d>,
but dt_binding_check fails:
$ make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml -j12
LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings
DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts
CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
DTC_CHK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb
/home/fabio/linux-next/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb:
tmu@f0000: fsl,tmu-range: [[655360, 589862, 524362, 65642, 0, 0, 0]]
is too short
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml#
What is wrong with the yaml changes to tell that imx93 has 7 items for
fsl,tmu-range?
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems
2023-12-09 19:22 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2023-12-09 20:23 ` Conor Dooley
2023-12-09 20:59 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-12-09 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Estevam
Cc: daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, robh+dt, conor+dt,
linux-pm, devicetree, Fabio Estevam
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5423 bytes --]
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 04:22:31PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:27 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > tbh, this seems like a situation where per compatible constraints should
> > be added, since each of the devices listed above has different
> > requirements.
>
> Ok, I am trying to add the device constraints as suggested.
>
> For example: I am trying to describe that imx93 has 7 items for fsl,tmu-range:
>
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
> enum:
> - fsl,qoriq-tmu
> - fsl,imx8mq-tmu
> + - fsl,imx93-tmu
>
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
> @@ -33,7 +34,15 @@ properties:
> description: |
> The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC
> reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc.
> - maxItems: 4
> + items:
> + - description: TTR0CR
> + - description: TTR1CR
> + - description: TTR2CR
> + - description: TTR3CR
> + - description: TTR4CR
> + - description: TTR5CR
> + - description: TTR6CR
> + minItems: 4
>
> fsl,tmu-calibration:
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
> @@ -69,15 +78,33 @@ required:
> - fsl,tmu-calibration
> - '#thermal-sensor-cells'
>
> +
^^ extra newline here I think.
> +allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - fsl,imx93-tmu
> + then:
> + properties:
> + fsl,tmu-range:
> + minItems: 7
> + maxItems: 7
> + else:
> + properties:
> + fsl,tmu-range:
> + maxItems: 4
> +
> additionalProperties: false
>
> examples:
> - |
> tmu@f0000 {
> - compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu";
> + compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu";
> reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>;
> interrupts = <18 2 0 0>;
> - fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a>;
> + fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0 0>;
> fsl,tmu-calibration = <0x00000000 0x00000025>,
> <0x00000001 0x00000028>,
> <0x00000002 0x0000002d>,
>
> but dt_binding_check fails:
>
> $ make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml -j12
> LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings
> DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts
> CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> DTC_CHK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb
> /home/fabio/linux-next/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb:
> tmu@f0000: fsl,tmu-range: [[655360, 589862, 524362, 65642, 0, 0, 0]]
> is too short
> from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml#
>
> What is wrong with the yaml changes to tell that imx93 has 7 items for
> fsl,tmu-range?
You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT.
I think something like the below better matches your constraints?
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
index 145744027234..540169806cc8 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
enum:
- fsl,qoriq-tmu
- fsl,imx8mq-tmu
+ - fsl,imx93-tmu
reg:
maxItems: 1
@@ -33,7 +34,17 @@ properties:
description: |
The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC
reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc.
- maxItems: 4
+ items:
+ items:
+ - description: TTR0CR
+ - description: TTR1CR
+ - description: TTR2CR
+ - description: TTR3CR
+ - description: TTR4CR
+ - description: TTR5CR
+ - description: TTR6CR
+ minItems: 4
+ maxItems: 1
fsl,tmu-calibration:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
@@ -69,15 +80,34 @@ required:
- fsl,tmu-calibration
- '#thermal-sensor-cells'
+
+allOf:
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - fsl,imx93-tmu
+ then:
+ properties:
+ fsl,tmu-range:
+ items:
+ minItems: 7
+ else:
+ properties:
+ fsl,tmu-range:
+ items:
+ maxItems: 4
+
additionalProperties: false
examples:
- |
tmu@f0000 {
- compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu";
reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <18 2 0 0>;
- fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a>;
+ fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0 0>;
fsl,tmu-calibration = <0x00000000 0x00000025>,
<0x00000001 0x00000028>,
<0x00000002 0x0000002d>,
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems
2023-12-09 20:23 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2023-12-09 20:59 ` Fabio Estevam
2023-12-10 14:52 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2023-12-09 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt,
robh+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree
Hi Conor,
On 09/12/2023 17:23, Conor Dooley wrote:
> You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT.
> I think something like the below better matches your constraints?
Thanks for your example.
With your change the fsl,imx93-tmu case works correctly:
if I pass the number of fsl,tmu-range entries different than 7,
dt_binding_check correctly complains.
However, if I pass 7 entries to fsl,qoriq-tmu it should complain as it
expects 4, but it
does not.
On top of your patch:
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ additionalProperties: false
examples:
- |
tmu@f0000 {
- compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu";
+ compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu";
reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <18 2 0 0>;
fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0
0 0>;
make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml
LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings
DTEX
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts
CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
DTC_CHK
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb
Any suggestions?
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems
2023-12-09 20:59 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2023-12-10 14:52 ` Conor Dooley
2023-12-10 15:37 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-12-10 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Estevam
Cc: Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt,
robh+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3952 bytes --]
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:59:17PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On 09/12/2023 17:23, Conor Dooley wrote:
>
> > You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT.
> > I think something like the below better matches your constraints?
>
> Thanks for your example.
>
> With your change the fsl,imx93-tmu case works correctly:
> if I pass the number of fsl,tmu-range entries different than 7,
> dt_binding_check correctly complains.
>
> However, if I pass 7 entries to fsl,qoriq-tmu it should complain as it
> expects 4, but it
btw, unrelated - minItems seems (from a grep) like it needs to be 2 not
4.
> does not.
>
> On top of your patch:
>
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ additionalProperties: false
> examples:
> - |
> tmu@f0000 {
> - compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu";
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu";
> reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>;
> interrupts = <18 2 0 0>;
> fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0
> 0>;
>
> make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml
> LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings
> DTEX
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts
> CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> DTC_CHK
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb
>
> Any suggestions?
I dunno. I spent far far longer than I would like to admit trying to fix
this. Firstly my suggestion here is crap I think and only applies to
___matrices___. I think it needs to be the way you had it in your diff,
but I cannot figure out why it doesn't apply the maxItems constraint.
Perhaps Rob or Krzysztof can figure out what we were overlooking.
The diff in question was something like:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
index 145744027234..50787938d605 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
enum:
- fsl,qoriq-tmu
- fsl,imx8mq-tmu
+ - fsl,imx93-tmu
reg:
maxItems: 1
@@ -33,7 +34,15 @@ properties:
description: |
The values to be programmed into TTRnCR, as specified by the SoC
reference manual. The first cell is TTR0CR, the second is TTR1CR, etc.
- maxItems: 4
+ minItems: 2
+ items:
+ - description: TTR0CR
+ - description: TTR1CR
+ - description: TTR2CR
+ - description: TTR3CR
+ - description: TTR4CR
+ - description: TTR5CR
+ - description: TTR6CR
fsl,tmu-calibration:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
@@ -69,15 +78,30 @@ required:
- fsl,tmu-calibration
- '#thermal-sensor-cells'
+allOf:
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ const: fsl,imx93-tmu
+ then:
+ properties:
+ fsl,tmu-range:
+ minItems: 7
+ else:
+ properties:
+ fsl,tmu-range:
+ maxItems: 4
+
additionalProperties: false
examples:
- |
tmu@f0000 {
- compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-tmu";
reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <18 2 0 0>;
- fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a>;
+ fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0x0 0x0>;
fsl,tmu-calibration = <0x00000000 0x00000025>,
<0x00000001 0x00000028>,
<0x00000002 0x0000002d>,
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems
2023-12-10 14:52 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2023-12-10 15:37 ` Rob Herring
2023-12-14 17:13 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2023-12-10 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: Fabio Estevam, Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 02:52:45PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:59:17PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Conor,
> >
> > On 09/12/2023 17:23, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >
> > > You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT.
> > > I think something like the below better matches your constraints?
> >
> > Thanks for your example.
> >
> > With your change the fsl,imx93-tmu case works correctly:
> > if I pass the number of fsl,tmu-range entries different than 7,
> > dt_binding_check correctly complains.
> >
> > However, if I pass 7 entries to fsl,qoriq-tmu it should complain as it
> > expects 4, but it
>
> btw, unrelated - minItems seems (from a grep) like it needs to be 2 not
> 4.
>
> > does not.
> >
> > On top of your patch:
> >
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ additionalProperties: false
> > examples:
> > - |
> > tmu@f0000 {
> > - compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu";
> > + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu";
> > reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>;
> > interrupts = <18 2 0 0>;
> > fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0
> > 0>;
> >
> > make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml
> > LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings
> > DTEX
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts
> > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> > DTC_CHK
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb
> >
> > Any suggestions?
>
> I dunno. I spent far far longer than I would like to admit trying to fix
> this. Firstly my suggestion here is crap I think and only applies to
> ___matrices___. I think it needs to be the way you had it in your diff,
> but I cannot figure out why it doesn't apply the maxItems constraint.
>
> Perhaps Rob or Krzysztof can figure out what we were overlooking.
> The diff in question was something like:
I suspect something is going afoul in the fixups. Will look at it
tomorrow.
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems
2023-12-10 15:37 ` Rob Herring
@ 2023-12-14 17:13 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-03 21:39 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-12-14 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: Fabio Estevam, Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2510 bytes --]
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 09:37:49AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 02:52:45PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:59:17PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > Hi Conor,
> > >
> > > On 09/12/2023 17:23, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > >
> > > > You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT.
> > > > I think something like the below better matches your constraints?
> > >
> > > Thanks for your example.
> > >
> > > With your change the fsl,imx93-tmu case works correctly:
> > > if I pass the number of fsl,tmu-range entries different than 7,
> > > dt_binding_check correctly complains.
> > >
> > > However, if I pass 7 entries to fsl,qoriq-tmu it should complain as it
> > > expects 4, but it
> >
> > btw, unrelated - minItems seems (from a grep) like it needs to be 2 not
> > 4.
> >
> > > does not.
> > >
> > > On top of your patch:
> > >
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> > > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ additionalProperties: false
> > > examples:
> > > - |
> > > tmu@f0000 {
> > > - compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu";
> > > + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu";
> > > reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>;
> > > interrupts = <18 2 0 0>;
> > > fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0
> > > 0>;
> > >
> > > make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml
> > > LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings
> > > DTEX
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts
> > > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> > > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> > > DTC_CHK
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb
> > >
> > > Any suggestions?
> >
> > I dunno. I spent far far longer than I would like to admit trying to fix
> > this. Firstly my suggestion here is crap I think and only applies to
> > ___matrices___. I think it needs to be the way you had it in your diff,
> > but I cannot figure out why it doesn't apply the maxItems constraint.
> >
> > Perhaps Rob or Krzysztof can figure out what we were overlooking.
> > The diff in question was something like:
>
> I suspect something is going afoul in the fixups. Will look at it
> tomorrow.
Did you manage to figure out what was causing this btw?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems
2023-12-14 17:13 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2024-01-03 21:39 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-03 21:51 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2024-01-03 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: Fabio Estevam, Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 10:13 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 09:37:49AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 02:52:45PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:59:17PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > > Hi Conor,
> > > >
> > > > On 09/12/2023 17:23, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > You're adding the constraints and items at the wrong level AFAICT.
> > > > > I think something like the below better matches your constraints?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your example.
> > > >
> > > > With your change the fsl,imx93-tmu case works correctly:
> > > > if I pass the number of fsl,tmu-range entries different than 7,
> > > > dt_binding_check correctly complains.
> > > >
> > > > However, if I pass 7 entries to fsl,qoriq-tmu it should complain as it
> > > > expects 4, but it
> > >
> > > btw, unrelated - minItems seems (from a grep) like it needs to be 2 not
> > > 4.
> > >
> > > > does not.
> > > >
> > > > On top of your patch:
> > > >
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.yaml
> > > > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ additionalProperties: false
> > > > examples:
> > > > - |
> > > > tmu@f0000 {
> > > > - compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu";
> > > > + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-tmu";
> > > > reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>;
> > > > interrupts = <18 2 0 0>;
> > > > fsl,tmu-range = <0x000a0000 0x00090026 0x0008004a 0x0001006a 0 0
> > > > 0>;
> > > >
> > > > make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qoriq-thermal.yaml
> > > > LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings
> > > > DTEX
> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dts
> > > > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> > > > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> > > > DTC_CHK
> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qoriq-thermal.example.dtb
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestions?
> > >
> > > I dunno. I spent far far longer than I would like to admit trying to fix
> > > this. Firstly my suggestion here is crap I think and only applies to
> > > ___matrices___. I think it needs to be the way you had it in your diff,
> > > but I cannot figure out why it doesn't apply the maxItems constraint.
> > >
> > > Perhaps Rob or Krzysztof can figure out what we were overlooking.
> > > The diff in question was something like:
> >
> > I suspect something is going afoul in the fixups. Will look at it
> > tomorrow.
>
> Did you manage to figure out what was causing this btw?
Yes. There's not really an immediate fix I see. The issue is in the
if/then schemas we don't have enough information to know the type of
fsl,tmu-range. To work correctly, it needs to be transformed to:
fsl,tmu-range:
items:
minItems: 7
maxItems: 7
This goes back to everything gets encoded into a 2 dim matrix, but the
schemas try to hide this encoding. My plan here is to eventually drop
doing that and decode properties to their correct type. That will drop
a lot of the fixups. I have patches to do that, but then it has other
corner cases.
So short term, I'd just leave things such that they don't warn or just
drop the conditional.
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems
2024-01-03 21:39 ` Rob Herring
@ 2024-01-03 21:51 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2024-01-03 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: Conor Dooley, Fabio Estevam, daniel.lezcano, rafael,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, conor+dt, linux-pm, devicetree
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 6:39 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> Yes. There's not really an immediate fix I see. The issue is in the
> if/then schemas we don't have enough information to know the type of
> fsl,tmu-range. To work correctly, it needs to be transformed to:
>
> fsl,tmu-range:
> items:
> minItems: 7
> maxItems: 7
Is this a typo?
minItems cannot be 7.
- lx2160a has two fsl,tmu-range entries
- imx8mq has four fsl,tmu-range entries.
> This goes back to everything gets encoded into a 2 dim matrix, but the
> schemas try to hide this encoding. My plan here is to eventually drop
> doing that and decode properties to their correct type. That will drop
> a lot of the fixups. I have patches to do that, but then it has other
> corner cases.
>
> So short term, I'd just leave things such that they don't warn or just
> drop the conditional.
Is my v3 proposal good then?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/20230928222130.580487-1-festevam@gmail.com/
It fixes all fsl,tmu-range warnings
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-03 21:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-28 22:21 [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: thermal: qoriq-thermal: Adjust fsl,tmu-range min/maxItems Fabio Estevam
2023-10-02 12:27 ` Conor Dooley
2023-12-09 19:22 ` Fabio Estevam
2023-12-09 20:23 ` Conor Dooley
2023-12-09 20:59 ` Fabio Estevam
2023-12-10 14:52 ` Conor Dooley
2023-12-10 15:37 ` Rob Herring
2023-12-14 17:13 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-03 21:39 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-03 21:51 ` Fabio Estevam
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).