From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 391F037A for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: from mail-oi1-f175.google.com (mail-oi1-f175.google.com [209.85.167.175]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 406D2BD; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 07:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3b2b1a6fd5eso321281b6e.0; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 07:09:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697206165; x=1697810965; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=32q64sOF2d1XvMlGkpm0O35o7axtMas1mV8rP6bTVn8=; b=iw2k+HAuEPDhkAuHndh1Z9Uj5WBQ4OongTYhFJlddtTIlntpd+2nxt/bBcndzM82MR VTrOHtGmcxV9KUrOVmnAFAeepuDiPnFS0appF0iNbIHu5mcfGP64LlPPUTuzLkmUskF5 KwZH+EK6+uUEgPKPtiOeVQ6qlct/rPglDWQPoCvTVyNoAocojp08PMA5JVht/WhwaR1W otdiT2nrzxScEjEGR6dPcNJBJIRGGsZl26GkdoaXN/DN/tx4BWVAps4/ryv5JV1rKMhu 0k7MApEkDjDn8vrroPkJ92oNYonBZ2Fm0z3f2PkwaglhH5Pcu/b5sKwTKnfTdhPjkc0Z qeXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzAnYZ6Y6n4qTVouyd3WVgau7WAAn4yxCgs518j+Wp0L/ibo54j SH4gvBBQId7I2TaLkB82kAhmGElLHg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE3WfnWPCV4ZgQOO+7n+hC2sS/a0WY7WfHDYyEnWNzabar4DxPdMiXBJQCW6Gy4BMVdliteAg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1302:b0:3a9:9bb4:485c with SMTP id y2-20020a056808130200b003a99bb4485cmr37530634oiv.8.1697206165505; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 07:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh_at_kernel.org (66-90-144-107.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.144.107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o15-20020a0568080f8f00b003a747ea96a8sm747696oiw.43.2023.10.13.07.09.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Oct 2023 07:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 3793059 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:09:21 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:09:21 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Bryan O'Donoghue Cc: andersson@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, jonathan@marek.ca, quic_tdas@quicinc.com, vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] media: dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sc8280xp-camss binding Message-ID: <20231013140921.GA3773179-robh@kernel.org> References: <20231012113100.3656480-1-bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> <20231012113100.3656480-4-bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231012113100.3656480-4-bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:30:59PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > Add bindings for qcom,sc8280xp-camss in order to support the camera > subsystem for sc8280xp as found in the Lenovo x13s Laptop. You don't need 2 'media' in the subject. > > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > --- > This patch depends-on: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231004161853.86382-2-bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org/T Who is supposed to apply the above and this patch? Normally, this would go thru the media tree, but you didn't send it to them or the media list. You did Cc the clock maintainers which seems weird on its own, but I suppose based on the bot error that's because the above patch is a clock patch. But why would the clock maintainers care about this one. I can only guess your intent is for all of this to be merged thru the QCom tree. We shouldn't have to sort thru these series and guess though. You should state that unless you really don't know, but I'd expect you've been around long enough to know. Rob