devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de,
	Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Clean up DDR type register defines
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 14:03:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231016120351.GA3359458@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1eaa8d5b-af6b-71bb-df7a-d438b483f5bb@kernel.org>

On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 04:11:22AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 23. 7. 4. 18:32, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Use the HIWORD_UPDATE() define known from other rockchip drivers to
> > make the defines look less odd to the readers who've seen other
> > rockchip drivers.
> > 
> > The HIWORD registers have their functional bits in the lower 16 bits
> > whereas the upper 16 bits contain a mask. Only the functional bits that
> > have the corresponding mask bit set are modified during a write. Although
> > the register writes look different, the end result should be the same,
> > at least there's no functional change intended with this patch.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> > index 6bccb6fbcfc0c..6b3ef97b3be09 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> > @@ -26,15 +26,19 @@
> >  
> >  #define DMC_MAX_CHANNELS	2
> >  
> > +#define HIWORD_UPDATE(val, mask)	((val) | (mask) << 16)
> > +
> >  /* DDRMON_CTRL */
> >  #define DDRMON_CTRL	0x04
> > -#define CLR_DDRMON_CTRL	(0x1f0000 << 0)
> > -#define LPDDR4_EN	(0x10001 << 4)
> > -#define HARDWARE_EN	(0x10001 << 3)
> > -#define LPDDR3_EN	(0x10001 << 2)
> > -#define SOFTWARE_EN	(0x10001 << 1)
> > -#define SOFTWARE_DIS	(0x10000 << 1)
> > -#define TIME_CNT_EN	(0x10001 << 0)
> > +#define DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4		BIT(5)
> > +#define DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4		BIT(4)
> > +#define DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN		BIT(3)
> > +#define DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23		BIT(2)
> > +#define DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN		BIT(1)
> > +#define DDRMON_CTRL_TIMER_CNT_EN	BIT(0)
> > +#define DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK	(DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4 | \
> > +					 DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4 | \
> > +					 DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23)
> >  
> >  #define DDRMON_CH0_COUNT_NUM		0x28
> >  #define DDRMON_CH0_DFI_ACCESS_NUM	0x2c
> > @@ -73,16 +77,20 @@ static void rockchip_dfi_start_hardware_counter(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
> >  	void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
> >  
> >  	/* clear DDRMON_CTRL setting */
> > -	writel_relaxed(CLR_DDRMON_CTRL, dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
> > +	writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, DDRMON_CTRL_TIMER_CNT_EN | DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN |
> > +		       DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN), dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
> 
> You mentioned that there are no behavior changes even if the different value is written.
> But, it looks strange. Could you please explain more detailed about it?

Many registers on Rockchip SoCs are effectively only 16 bits wide. The
lower 16 bits are the functional bits. The upper 16 bits contain a mask
value. The lower 16 bits are only modified when the coresponding bit in
the upper 16bits is set.

For example writing 0x0001dead has the same effect as writing
0x00010001: The lower bit is set, the remaining are unchanged due to the
mask value being 0.

> 
> 
> CLR_DDRMON_CTRL is 0x1f0000

This clears the lower 5 bits.

> vs.
> HIWORD_UPDATE(0, DDRMON_CTRL_TIMER_CNT_EN | DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN | DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN) = (0 | (BIT(0)|BIT(1)|BIT(3))<<16) = 0xb0000

This clears BIT(0), BIT(1) and BIT(3), so it clears:

DDRMON_CTRL_TIMER_CNT_EN, DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN and DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN.

In fact it doesn't clear DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23 and DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4 like
the operation with CLR_DDRMON_CTRL does, but the LPDDR type bits are
handled below:

> 			
> >  
> >  	/* set ddr type to dfi */
> >  	if (dfi->ddr_type == ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3)
> > -		writel_relaxed(LPDDR3_EN, dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
> > +		writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23, DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK),
> > +			       dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
> 
> LPDDR3_EN	(0x10001 << 2) = 0x40004

This sets BIT(2) aka DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23

> vs.
> HIWORD_UPDATE(DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23, DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK) = (BIT(2) | (BIT(5)|BIT(4)|BIT(2))<<16) = 0x340004

This sets BIT(2) and *clears* BIT(4) (DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4) and BIT(5)
(DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4). So effectively we no longer clear BIT(4) in the
first register access as we do with CLR_DDRMON_CTRL, but in the second
register access instead.

This also clears BIT(5) which was untouched previously, but this bit had
never been set by the driver, so should be 0 anyway.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-16 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-04  9:32 [PATCH v7 00/26] Add perf support to the rockchip-dfi driver Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 01/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Make pmu regmap mandatory Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:03   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 02/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Embed desc into private data struct Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:04   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 03/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: use consistent name for " Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:06   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 04/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add SoC specific init function Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:22   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 05/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: dfi store raw values in counter struct Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:34   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 06/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Use free running counter Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:21   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 07/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: introduce channel mask Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:21   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 11:22     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-16 12:45       ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:28         ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 08/26] PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc,dfi: generalize DDRTYPE defines Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:43   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 13:10     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 09/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Clean up DDR type register defines Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 19:11   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:03     ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2023-10-17  8:34       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 10/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add RK3568 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:17   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 11:34     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:31       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 11/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR2 correctly Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:24   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 12/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR4X Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:26   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 13/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Pass private data struct to internal functions Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:28   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 14/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Prepare for multiple users Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:46   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 15/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: give variable a better name Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:37   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 16/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add perf support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 21:48   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:16     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:35       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 17/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: make register stride SoC specific Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 21:57   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 18/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: account for multiple DDRMON_CTRL registers Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:19   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:49     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:35       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 19/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for RK3588 Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:22   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 20/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: convert Rockchip DFI binding to yaml Sascha Hauer
2023-10-09  0:40   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 21/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add rk3568 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:24   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 22/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add rk3588 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:24   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 23/26] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: add rockchip,rk3588-pmugrf Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 24/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: Enable DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 25/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk356x: Add DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 26/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s: " Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231016120351.GA3359458@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=chanwoo@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=vincent.legoll@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).