From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B26BD7F9 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 15:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="GR6bmFPh" Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06EE1AD; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 08:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9d34b2b51a5so52213466b.2; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 08:09:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698592147; x=1699196947; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=JDVvws0xcol9Z8gLUvHiqok3duMmv3cfjwte/9TgRL8=; b=GR6bmFPhJxo9bzgOxo9Nlp5nEAeWOcxwqGCmDl41WUAl67T5EpSLSu8b5OWjj3Ejc5 cunC/CRFuuZV7VMC01iOYGwpzmPCIgcWpw2FbqTWRwGtvFVtLbj57M7NDeWto7xL/OXX dZzhQ/54kMK74tb+AkXhL5iQ+eDE/twvexrK/C0RCD63rNg+U1HdMB6nfJbENjs4yBVV zx9x4E8VJ23iTh7XVTV8yHDaVzopmAkpfl7w5T7qGeW3+IL8EUBdvNlP06HIGO1F0ISm rTEilrNlpjWID2Qn/yRgduQf+uekDNpEqfroRZCP3ObKjiiGNdbhyNlTkPZnurRaYPnS YX+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698592147; x=1699196947; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JDVvws0xcol9Z8gLUvHiqok3duMmv3cfjwte/9TgRL8=; b=fC0DQlCvvGZ/cxi8TJfqMR2cUMH+mQybGdVlomHP5OHSNOKCYC01KnwrVhpc6VCbUV z87pgW4fFQIb0yX/LMNKCitKB5YTiN+DnNq1Icrr7VeOVAkmjZ36noesJ/RwnApDUr0L F+y4m1yF9RpsOIWECJJtKEX4r6FOtItE2WQ7rGKR2uOX7cX2xu6CorsOutEm532KHV+I QOoOt/Ul3teL/3XNvQL00c1uovwn1z6IMVnURijRLOG9RxxqeUClZSGaOpxUveGWDQJA oKvSiX1PL0JIezannc2BthZ3nmTBE06zgGULphxdGG4y/9idWpiwyFmVCvI2dPxrLVBV 2vSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz1zSsbqZJ629x1o0kxNZhg0/j1ZNKzkAZ3nwLjgwuORONijUWf JWvoiMO2queX07mXq4WJBJ4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE+TbbZnZkg8aYetZpu32U/3BElYo/MIJd7ZMusXP8zXHlZckohHAOeTlnBDVtu1+IOcInWaA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f74a:b0:9d2:7f29:2baf with SMTP id jp10-20020a170906f74a00b009d27f292bafmr1902079ejb.75.1698592147069; Sun, 29 Oct 2023 08:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2a02:8109:8c00:3664:9abe:5e88:5792:87a5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lc9-20020a170906dfe900b009ad81554c1bsm4391076ejc.55.2023.10.29.08.09.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 29 Oct 2023 08:09:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Nik Bune To: krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, afd@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, n2h9z4@gmail.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, wim@linux-watchdog.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: watchdog: davinci-wdt: convert txt to yaml Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 16:09:05 +0100 Message-Id: <20231029150905.108531-1-n2h9z4@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <147aebc9-8d76-49d4-a80f-eb6894868688@linaro.org> References: <147aebc9-8d76-49d4-a80f-eb6894868688@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello! >On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 at 08:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >On 28/10/2023 19:51, Nik Bune wrote: >>>> + power-domains: >>>> + description: >>>> + A phandle and PM domain specifier as defined by bindings of >>>> + the power controller specified by phandle. >>>> + See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml for details. >>> >>> I think you missed Rob's comment in reply to Andrew, about constraining >>> and ordering the power-domains: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231026203037.GA327324-robh@kernel.org/ >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Conor. >> >> I didn't get what should be done with respect to the comment above: >> Should we wait for the response from Andrew, >> or should we skip and remove the the power-domains definition for this binding, >> or add "maxItems: 1" to power-domains definition? > >None of the options above allow to send the same code without maxItems. >Sending new version without addressing feedback is basically ignoring >the feedback and next time you will have annoyed reviewers... > >Best regards, >Krzysztof > I didn't ignore. v3 patch was sent 37 minutes before the Rob's comment to v2. Kind regards, Nik.