From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Cc: "Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, "Faiz Abbas" <faiz_abbas@ti.com>,
"Benoît Cousson" <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@ew.tq-group.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4] Revert "ARM: dts: Move am33xx and am43xx mmc nodes to sdhci-omap driver"
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 12:28:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023110613-fringe-ended-5390@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231106095048.8396-1-matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:50:48AM +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> This reverts commit d0c69c722ff16ce2481a5e0932c6d5b172109f21.
>
> The reverted commit completely breaks MMC on the AM33xx/AM437x for
> multiple reasons:
>
> - The changed compatible strings ti,am335-sdhci and ti,am437-sdhci
> aren't supported on Linux 5.4 at all, so no driver is found
> - Even when additionally backporting the support for these compatible
> strings in the sdhci-omap driver, I could not the the MMC interfaces
> to work on our TQMa335x SoM - the interface would time out during card
> initialization for both an eMMC and an SD card.
>
> I did not investigate the cause of the timeouts further, and instead
> just reverted the commit - switching to a different MMC driver in a stable
> kernel seems like a rather risky change unless it's thoroughly tested,
> which has obviously not happened in this case.
>
> The reverted commit is also given as a Stable-dep-of commit 2eb502f496f7
> ("ARM: dts: am33xx: Fix MMCHS0 dma properties"), however the conflict
> resulting when only the one commit is reverted is trivial to resolve,
> which leads to working MMC controllers again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
> ---
>
> I have not checked if other stable kernels exhibit the same breakage; it
> might be a good idea to revert the change for all stable branches unless
> it is proven that the sdhci-omap driver actually works.
This was only backported to 5.4.y, thanks for catching this, now queued
up.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-06 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-06 9:50 [PATCH 5.4] Revert "ARM: dts: Move am33xx and am43xx mmc nodes to sdhci-omap driver" Matthias Schiffer
2023-11-06 11:28 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023110613-fringe-ended-5390@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=faiz_abbas@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox