devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>, Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>,
	Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@amd.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] of: overlay: Synchronize of_overlay_remove() with the devlink removals
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:41:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231130174126.688486-3-herve.codina@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231130174126.688486-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>

In the following sequence:
  1) of_platform_depopulate()
  2) of_overlay_remove()

During the step 1, devices are destroyed and devlinks are removed.
During the step 2, OF nodes are destroyed but
__of_changeset_entry_destroy() can raise warnings related to missing
of_node_put():
  ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2 ...

Indeed, during the devlink removals performed at step 1, the removal
itself releasing the device (and the attached of_node) is done by a job
queued in a workqueue and so, it is done asynchronously with respect to
function calls.
When the warning is present, of_node_put() will be called but wrongly
too late from the workqueue job.

In order to be sure that any ongoing devlink removals are done before
the of_node destruction, synchronize the of_overlay_remove() with the
devlink removals.

Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/of/overlay.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c
index a9a292d6d59b..5c5f808b163e 100644
--- a/drivers/of/overlay.c
+++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c
@@ -1202,6 +1202,12 @@ int of_overlay_remove(int *ovcs_id)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Wait for any ongoing device link removals before removing some of
+	 * nodes
+	 */
+	device_link_wait_removal();
+
 	mutex_lock(&of_mutex);
 
 	ovcs = idr_find(&ovcs_idr, *ovcs_id);
-- 
2.42.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-30 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-30 17:41 [PATCH 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals Herve Codina
2023-11-30 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal() Herve Codina
2024-02-21  0:31   ` Saravana Kannan
2024-02-21  6:56     ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23  1:08       ` Saravana Kannan
2024-02-23  8:13         ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23  8:46         ` Herve Codina
2024-02-23  8:56           ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23  9:11     ` Herve Codina
2024-02-23 10:45       ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-29 23:26         ` Saravana Kannan
2024-03-01  7:14           ` Nuno Sá
2023-11-30 17:41 ` Herve Codina [this message]
2024-02-21  0:37   ` [PATCH 2/2] of: overlay: Synchronize of_overlay_remove() with the devlink removals Saravana Kannan
2024-02-21  7:03     ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23  9:45     ` Herve Codina
2024-02-23 10:35       ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-27 15:24     ` Herve Codina
2024-02-27 16:55       ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-27 17:54         ` Herve Codina
2024-02-27 19:07           ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-27 19:13             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27 19:28               ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-06 17:15 ` [PATCH 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with " Rob Herring
2023-12-07  3:09   ` Saravana Kannan
2023-12-20 17:16     ` Luca Ceresoli
2023-12-20 18:12       ` Herve Codina
2024-02-21  0:19     ` Saravana Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231130174126.688486-3-herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
    --cc=max.zhen@amd.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sonal.santan@amd.com \
    --cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).