public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Nuno Sa via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org>
Cc: <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	Olivier MOYSAN <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] iio: adc: ad9467: add mutex to struct ad9467_state
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 15:23:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231204152301.6c212539@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231121-dev-iio-backend-v1-6-6a3d542eba35@analog.com>

On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:20:19 +0100
Nuno Sa via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> 
> When calling ad9467_set_scale(), multiple calls to ad9467_spi_write()
> are done which means we need to properly protect the whole operation so
> we are sure we will be in a sane state if two concurrent calls occur.
> 
> Fixes: ad6797120238 ("iio: adc: ad9467: add support AD9467 ADC")
> Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> index 04474dbfa631..91821dee03b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>   *
>   * Copyright 2012-2020 Analog Devices Inc.
>   */
> -
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
> @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ struct ad9467_state {
>  	unsigned int			output_mode;
>  
>  	struct gpio_desc		*pwrdown_gpio;
> +	/* protect against concurrent accesses to the device */
Not very specific.  Concurrent access usually fine at granularity of
individual read/write as the bus locks protect it.  What state
is actually being protected?  A shared buffer or some state that we
need to ensure remains consistent between driver and device?

> +	struct mutex			lock;
>  };
>  
>  static int ad9467_spi_read(struct spi_device *spi, unsigned int reg)
> @@ -162,6 +164,7 @@ static int ad9467_reg_access(struct adi_axi_adc_conv *conv, unsigned int reg,
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!readval) {
> +		guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
>  		ret = ad9467_spi_write(spi, reg, writeval);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> @@ -310,6 +313,7 @@ static int ad9467_set_scale(struct adi_axi_adc_conv *conv, int val, int val2)
>  		if (scale_val[0] != val || scale_val[1] != val2)
>  			continue;
>  
> +		guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
>  		ret = ad9467_spi_write(st->spi, AN877_ADC_REG_VREF,
>  				       info->scale_table[i][1]);
>  		if (ret < 0)
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-04 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-21 10:20 [PATCH 00/12] iio: add new backend framework Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 01/12] driver: core: allow modifying device_links flags Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] of: property: add device link support for io-backends Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 03/12] iio: add the IIO backend framework Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-04 15:38   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-06 12:05     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-06 17:15       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 04/12] iio: adc: ad9467: fix reset gpio handling Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-11-30 21:41   ` David Lechner
2023-12-01  8:47     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-01 17:01       ` David Lechner
2023-12-02  8:36         ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-04 15:15           ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-04 16:41             ` Nuno Sá
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 05/12] iio: adc: ad9467: don't ignore error codes Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-11-30 21:44   ` David Lechner
2023-12-01  8:47     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-04 15:19   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 06/12] iio: adc: ad9467: add mutex to struct ad9467_state Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-11-30 21:50   ` David Lechner
2023-12-01  8:49     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-04 15:21       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-04 15:23   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-12-04 16:10     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-04 16:51       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 07/12] iio: adc: ad9467: fix scale setting Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 08/12] iio: adc: ad9467: use spi_get_device_match_data() Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 09/12] iio: adc: ad9467: use chip_info variables instead of array Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-04 15:25   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-04 16:24     ` Nuno Sá
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 10/12] iio: adc: ad9467: convert to backend framework Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-11-22  0:54   ` kernel test robot
2023-11-30 23:30   ` David Lechner
2023-12-01  0:12     ` David Lechner
2023-12-01  9:08     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-01 17:44       ` David Lechner
2023-12-02  8:46         ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-04  8:56           ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-04 15:48       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-04 16:23         ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-04 16:57           ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-01  9:17     ` Nuno Sá
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 11/12] iio: adc: adi-axi-adc: convert to regmap Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-12-04 15:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-04 16:15     ` Nuno Sá
2023-11-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 12/12] iio: adc: adi-axi-adc: move to backend framework Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2023-11-21 23:27   ` kernel test robot
2023-11-25  7:42   ` kernel test robot
2023-11-30 23:33   ` David Lechner
2023-12-01  8:50     ` Nuno Sá
2023-11-23 17:36 ` [PATCH 00/12] iio: add new " Olivier MOYSAN
2023-11-24  9:15   ` Nuno Sá
2023-11-30 23:54 ` David Lechner
2023-12-01  8:41   ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-01  9:14     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-02  3:53   ` David Lechner
2023-12-02  9:37     ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-02 16:16       ` David Lechner
2023-12-04 14:49         ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231204152301.6c212539@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox