From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>, Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>,
Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@amd.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 11:15:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206171540.GA2697853-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231130174126.688486-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:41:07PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> Hi,
+Saravana for comment
Looks okay to me though.
>
> In the following sequence:
> of_platform_depopulate(); /* Remove devices from a DT overlay node */
> of_overlay_remove(); /* Remove the DT overlay node itself */
>
> Some warnings are raised by __of_changeset_entry_destroy() which was
> called from of_overlay_remove():
> ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2 ...
>
> The issue is that, during the device devlink removals triggered from the
> of_platform_depopulate(), jobs are put in a workqueue.
> These jobs drop the reference to the devices. When a device is no more
> referenced (refcount == 0), it is released and the reference to its
> of_node is dropped by a call to of_node_put().
> These operations are fully correct except that, because of the
> workqueue, they are done asynchronously with respect to function calls.
>
> In the sequence provided, the jobs are run too late, after the call to
> __of_changeset_entry_destroy() and so a missing of_node_put() call is
> detected by __of_changeset_entry_destroy().
>
> This series fixes this issue introducing device_link_wait_removal() in
> order to wait for the end of jobs execution (patch 1) and using this
> function to synchronize the overlay removal with the end of jobs
> execution (patch 2).
>
> Best regards,
> Hervé
>
> Herve Codina (2):
> driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal()
> of: overlay: Synchronize of_overlay_remove() with the devlink removals
>
> drivers/base/core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/of/overlay.c | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/device.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.42.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-30 17:41 [PATCH 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals Herve Codina
2023-11-30 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal() Herve Codina
2024-02-21 0:31 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-02-21 6:56 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23 1:08 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-02-23 8:13 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23 8:46 ` Herve Codina
2024-02-23 8:56 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23 9:11 ` Herve Codina
2024-02-23 10:45 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-29 23:26 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-03-01 7:14 ` Nuno Sá
2023-11-30 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] of: overlay: Synchronize of_overlay_remove() with the devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-02-21 0:37 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-02-21 7:03 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23 9:45 ` Herve Codina
2024-02-23 10:35 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-27 15:24 ` Herve Codina
2024-02-27 16:55 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-27 17:54 ` Herve Codina
2024-02-27 19:07 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-27 19:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27 19:28 ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-06 17:15 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2023-12-07 3:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with " Saravana Kannan
2023-12-20 17:16 ` Luca Ceresoli
2023-12-20 18:12 ` Herve Codina
2024-02-21 0:19 ` Saravana Kannan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231206171540.GA2697853-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
--cc=max.zhen@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sonal.santan@amd.com \
--cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).