devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>, Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>,
	Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@amd.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 11:15:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206171540.GA2697853-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231130174126.688486-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:41:07PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> Hi,

+Saravana for comment

Looks okay to me though.

> 
> In the following sequence:
>   of_platform_depopulate(); /* Remove devices from a DT overlay node */
>   of_overlay_remove(); /* Remove the DT overlay node itself */
> 
> Some warnings are raised by __of_changeset_entry_destroy() which  was
> called from of_overlay_remove():
>   ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2 ...
> 
> The issue is that, during the device devlink removals triggered from the
> of_platform_depopulate(), jobs are put in a workqueue.
> These jobs drop the reference to the devices. When a device is no more
> referenced (refcount == 0), it is released and the reference to its
> of_node is dropped by a call to of_node_put().
> These operations are fully correct except that, because of the
> workqueue, they are done asynchronously with respect to function calls.
> 
> In the sequence provided, the jobs are run too late, after the call to
> __of_changeset_entry_destroy() and so a missing of_node_put() call is
> detected by __of_changeset_entry_destroy().
> 
> This series fixes this issue introducing device_link_wait_removal() in
> order to wait for the end of jobs execution (patch 1) and using this
> function to synchronize the overlay removal with the end of jobs
> execution (patch 2).
> 
> Best regards,
> Hervé
> 
> Herve Codina (2):
>   driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal()
>   of: overlay: Synchronize of_overlay_remove() with the devlink removals
> 
>  drivers/base/core.c    | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/of/overlay.c   |  6 ++++++
>  include/linux/device.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-06 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-30 17:41 [PATCH 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals Herve Codina
2023-11-30 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal() Herve Codina
2024-02-21  0:31   ` Saravana Kannan
2024-02-21  6:56     ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23  1:08       ` Saravana Kannan
2024-02-23  8:13         ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23  8:46         ` Herve Codina
2024-02-23  8:56           ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23  9:11     ` Herve Codina
2024-02-23 10:45       ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-29 23:26         ` Saravana Kannan
2024-03-01  7:14           ` Nuno Sá
2023-11-30 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] of: overlay: Synchronize of_overlay_remove() with the devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-02-21  0:37   ` Saravana Kannan
2024-02-21  7:03     ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-23  9:45     ` Herve Codina
2024-02-23 10:35       ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-27 15:24     ` Herve Codina
2024-02-27 16:55       ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-27 17:54         ` Herve Codina
2024-02-27 19:07           ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-27 19:13             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27 19:28               ` Nuno Sá
2023-12-06 17:15 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2023-12-07  3:09   ` [PATCH 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with " Saravana Kannan
2023-12-20 17:16     ` Luca Ceresoli
2023-12-20 18:12       ` Herve Codina
2024-02-21  0:19     ` Saravana Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231206171540.GA2697853-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
    --cc=max.zhen@amd.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=sonal.santan@amd.com \
    --cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).