From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="V8QEsenX" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40D0F90; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 05:27:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701869263; x=1733405263; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=XUkNikLFxkRI2x0E4jzYEYV2cFpsJJkbcOTQSt8BVn8=; b=V8QEsenXajFgrrToqa2o00PeS++EQG1zM1eQ985mYoii/phGkeWmAYY7 FXwTxQ4o/OAi9X3RV1itFwzzkxyHEskFS+vTqzGuaGAUINr8yG3ZKxVR/ oGXGavUoRrqKkexms/9WYm/XJmuoEMnlQ8Ge7W9wv7d7MMO3QR6T/Y9r7 g5Xtq317X4ZA7q3thBfqAWpzVHRybyVvrei/YZAOul/msYHG5dWJRXGAu nUrmsOw9J0SSDl5et8BuaygibAvSDsDQEw9WqvSKuen6nEM9/soFamMwE Msrxv3wN0Ve4dADr+/gLcNBca3SW6ofrguSVwem4UP3hpifuR4VZ2DGQ+ g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10916"; a="930984" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,255,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="930984" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Dec 2023 05:27:42 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10916"; a="721084909" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,255,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="721084909" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2023 05:27:39 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rArw8-000Apo-2W; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 13:27:36 +0000 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 21:27:16 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com, Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Philipp Zabel Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] clk: stm32: introduce clocks for STM32MP257 platform Message-ID: <202312062107.FZNn2b0i-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231128164851.588315-5-gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231128164851.588315-5-gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com> Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on atorgue-stm32/stm32-next] [also build test WARNING on clk/clk-next robh/for-next linus/master v6.7-rc4 next-20231206] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/gabriel-fernandez-foss-st-com/clk-stm32mp1-move-stm32mp1-clock-driver-into-stm32-directory/20231129-005157 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/atorgue/stm32.git stm32-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231128164851.588315-5-gabriel.fernandez%40foss.st.com patch subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] clk: stm32: introduce clocks for STM32MP257 platform config: arm-randconfig-r132-20231201 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231206/202312062107.FZNn2b0i-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231206/202312062107.FZNn2b0i-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312062107.FZNn2b0i-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp25.c:1003:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'stm32mp25_cpt_gate' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp25.c:1005:29: sparse: sparse: symbol 'stm32mp25_clock_data' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp25.c:1011:29: sparse: sparse: symbol 'stm32mp25_reset_data' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/stm32mp25_cpt_gate +1003 drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp25.c 1002 > 1003 u16 stm32mp25_cpt_gate[GATE_NB]; 1004 > 1005 struct clk_stm32_clock_data stm32mp25_clock_data = { 1006 .gate_cpt = stm32mp25_cpt_gate, 1007 .gates = stm32mp25_gates, 1008 .muxes = stm32mp25_muxes, 1009 }; 1010 > 1011 struct clk_stm32_reset_data stm32mp25_reset_data = { 1012 .reset_lines = stm32mp25_reset_cfg, 1013 .nr_lines = ARRAY_SIZE(stm32mp25_reset_cfg), 1014 }; 1015 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki