Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: riscv: Add StarFive JH8100 SoC

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1554 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 08:14:06PM +0800, Sia Jee Heng wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for the StarFive JH8100 RISC-V SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sia Jee Heng <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/starfive.yaml | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/starfive.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/starfive.yaml
> index cc4d92f0a1bf..12d7844232b8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/starfive.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/starfive.yaml
> @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ properties:
>                - starfive,visionfive-2-v1.3b
>            - const: starfive,jh7110
>  
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - starfive,jh8100-evb

Hmm, reading some of the other threads it appears that the evaluation
platform that you guys have is actually just an FPGA? Could you please
provide more information as to what this "evb" actually is?

If it is just an FPGA-based evaluation platform I don't think that we
want to merge patches for the platform. I'm fine with patches adding
peripheral support, but the soc/board dts files and things like pinctrl
or clock drivers I am not keen on.
Perhaps Emil also has an opinion on this.

Thanks,
Conor.

> +          - const: starfive,jh8100
>  additionalProperties: true
>  
>  ...
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]