From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D392D24B51; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 12:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NEoXliKl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D13EC433C8; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 12:06:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1702728402; bh=ymcicKWMiCxCMT8U9JeNofoguzL2CsM6z3lDqO7opc4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NEoXliKlLKZM+VPPvJGFQ0cDl/+XWHpmp3v9vaTCZtHZ5MSA8XD70wSnh0d1d+ce0 cl+7suhC3o+jVhNEJmJnY1KnKTHwT/LCzM0MQIrkq5/OBK1SFxVwHyXKzsQVnN2MSf /QWKdDyzCnvbwg29G83bCUleui3Z9GriILDkA8e+82yIENzPap5UU9PXnkqtsY5/cD vhu5FFDdLoQNbmIwenotNbd9HmU/523SXXir3f+R9wZaLHO9T2WhdoooZglPZF8DoJ LVSIvZIzL+6I+HzaLBM6yKZcRoxVsklWtAyXERd+TtgBMK3uqjFotH0qJZLeCBsigg wzRplkWCImdpQ== Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 12:06:35 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: JeeHeng Sia Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , "kernel@esmil.dk" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" , "krzk@kernel.org" , "conor+dt@kernel.org" , Paul Walmsley , "aou@eecs.berkeley.edu" , "daniel.lezcano@linaro.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "anup@brainfault.org" , Greg KH , "jirislaby@kernel.org" , "michal.simek@amd.com" , Michael Zhu , "drew@beagleboard.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Leyfoon Tan , Conor Dooley Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: riscv: Add StarFive JH8100 SoC Message-ID: <20231216-unknown-shakiness-8c4a5cd53006@spud> References: <20231214-platonic-unhearing-27e2ec3d8f75@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xnZVKVuLE9iuntqZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --xnZVKVuLE9iuntqZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:49:02AM +0000, JeeHeng Sia wrote: > Thank you everyone. I think I get your point. Is it possible to send "RFC" > patches for things like DT, clk&reset, and pinctrl? Please note that > these have been tested on FPGA/Emulator. For sure you can send them as RFC, yes. --xnZVKVuLE9iuntqZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZX2SywAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0i7tAQDWY8CCVBgjwFAM48GbHbn6JwBmS6Odm7A3xAHVilTqcAD+JLVOfmzJi/Pg YQekZntg/l4zEsu7HjxVLj9axaNDvgQ= =mrO6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xnZVKVuLE9iuntqZ--