From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D115360B6 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 15:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A312F4; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 07:08:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from donnerap.manchester.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E213D3F64C; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 07:07:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 15:07:14 +0000 From: Andre Przywara To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: sort alphabetically Message-ID: <20231221150714.53d40ea3@donnerap.manchester.arm.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20231221140614.639697-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> Organization: ARM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 15:45:17 +0100 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: Hi, > On 21/12/2023 15:06, Andre Przywara wrote: > > The sunxi.yaml file, holding all known board compatible names for > > devices with Allwinner SoCs, is apparently sorted alphabetically, by the > > "description" entry. However there are a few outliers. > > > > Re-order the entries to get a strict alphabetical ordering, so that: > > $ grep description: sunxi.yaml | sort -fc > > returns empty-handed. There is no change otherwise. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > > What was the existing order? Aren't this just shuffling again things? It assume the intention was to order "alphabetically by description", but there were some out-of-place entries which apparently slipped through review. Shall I add a comment at the top to note the order? Cheers, Andre