[PATCH v4 2/4] ASoC: tas2562: move tas2563 from tas2562 driver to tas2781 driver

[Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@ti.com>]

Move tas2563 from tas2562 driver to tas2781 driver to unbind tas2563 from
tas2562 driver code and bind it to tas2781 driver code, because tas2563
only work in bypass-DSP mode with tas2562 driver. In order to enable DSP
mode for tas2563, it has been moved to tas2781 driver. As to the hardware
part, such as register setting and DSP firmware, all these are stored in
the binary firmware. What tas2781 drivder dooes is to parse the firmware
and download it to the chip, then power on the chip. So, tas2781 driver
can be resued as tas2563 driver. Only attention will be paid to
downloading corresponding firmware.

Signed-off-by: Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@ti.com>

---
Change in v4:
 - Move tas2563 from tas2562 driver to tas2781 driver.
 - Add more comments on why move tas2563 to tas2781 driver.
 - Provide rationale in terms of bindings and hardware, not in terms of driver.
   Or at least not only.
---
 sound/soc/codecs/tas2562.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/tas2562.c b/sound/soc/codecs/tas2562.c
index 962c2cdfa017..54561ae598b8 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/tas2562.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/tas2562.c
@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ struct tas2562_data {
 
 enum tas256x_model {
 	TAS2562,
-	TAS2563,
 	TAS2564,
 	TAS2110,
 };
@@ -721,7 +720,6 @@ static int tas2562_parse_dt(struct tas2562_data *tas2562)
 
 static const struct i2c_device_id tas2562_id[] = {
 	{ "tas2562", TAS2562 },
-	{ "tas2563", TAS2563 },
 	{ "tas2564", TAS2564 },
 	{ "tas2110", TAS2110 },
 	{ }
@@ -770,7 +768,6 @@ static int tas2562_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
 static const struct of_device_id tas2562_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "ti,tas2562", },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,tas2563", },
 	{ .compatible = "ti,tas2564", },
 	{ .compatible = "ti,tas2110", },
 	{ },
-- 
2.34.1