Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: fsl, irqsteer: Add power-domains

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2144 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 08:31:26AM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2024, 17:49:03 CET schrieb Conor Dooley:
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:59:54AM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > > Hi Conor,
> > > 
> > > Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2024, 17:09:07 CET schrieb Conor Dooley:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:43:38AM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > > > > Some SoC like i.MX8QXP use a power-domain for this IP add it to the
> > > > > supported proerties. Fixes the dtbs_check warning:
> > > > > freescale/imx8qxp-tqma8xqp-mba8xx.dtb: irqsteer@56000000:
> > > > > 'power-domains'
> > > > > 
> > > > >  does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> > > > > 
> > > > > from schema $id:
> > > > > http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller/fsl,irqsteer.yaml#
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > > Notes:
> > > > >     Please note that both the board dts and the DT node for irqsteer
> > > > >     being
> > > > >     used, are still work-in-progress.
> > > > 
> > > > The binding doesn't even support the imx8qxp's irqsteer yet, I think
> > > > this should be added alongside support for that SoC. Am I missing
> > > > something?
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure if any additional SoC support is actually needed. 'fsl,imx-
> > > irqsteer' is available and that's what I use in my WiP. Also imx8mp also
> > > just uses the generic compatible. Only imx8mq uses 'fsl,imx8m-irqsteer'.
> > Why doesn't it used "imx8mq-irqsteer"? Should it not have its own
> > soc-specific compatible?
> 
> I would assume that "fsl,imx8m-irqsteer" is for the whole i.MX8M family. I 
> don't think a soc-specific compatible is needed at all. On top I can't see any 
> difference between i.MX8M and i.MX8/i.MX8X.
> If a soc-specific compatible is preferred, fine by me. But I don't expect any 
> difference despite imx8qxp/imx8qm requiring a power-domain.

Specific imx8mq compatibles exist for a wide range of peripherals, I'm
not sure why the irqsteer would be an exception.

Cheers,
Conor.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]