Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: add missing required clock

Marc Kleine-Budde
2024-01-30T13:01:46Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1258 bytes --]

On 30.01.2024 12:11:44, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:31:32PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 22.01.2024 14:56:09, Conor Dooley wrote:
>
> > > I think we already had this discussion on v1, where I said that the
> > > binding requires the clocks to be in that order, regardless of whether
> > > or not clock-names is provided. You feel more strongly about it than I
> > > do, so I will add them when I get around to sending a v3.
> >
> > Yes, this discussion sounded very familiar to me, never mind. Keep it as
> > is, and let's get this binding and the CAN driver upstream!
>
> BTW, I didn't see an ack on this nor do I see it in linux-next (yet).
> Are you expecting the patch to go with the rest via the clock tree,
> via the DT tree or will you be taking it with CAN stuff via netdev?
>
> I can resend this one patch with a netdev appropriate subject prefix
> if you like.

Feel free to take the whole series via the clock tree.

Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]