[PATCH 0/3] mailbox: imx: support i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU

[PATCH 0/3] mailbox: imx: support i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

- Add dt-bindings
- i.MX95 ELE/V2X use same register layout as i.MX8ULP S4 MU, but
  the TR/RR num is different. To make code reusable and not add too much
  macros, add runtime detect number of TR and RR by reading PAR_OFF
  registers.
- Add i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU entry in driver

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
Peng Fan (3):
      dt-bindings: mailbox: fsl,mu: add i.MX95 Generic/ELE/V2X MU compatible
      mailbox: imx: get RR/TR registers num from Parameter register
      mailbox: imx: support i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU

 .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml        |  8 +++-
 drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c                      | 48 +++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: ad5c60d66016e544c51ed98635a74073f761f45d
change-id: 20240122-imx-mailbox-243021d12030

Best regards,
-- 
Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mailbox: fsl,mu: add i.MX95 Generic/ELE/V2X MU compatible

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Add i.MX95 Generic, Secure Enclave and V2X Message Unit compatible string.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml
index 12e7a7d536a3..24e3d8dbc34a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml
@@ -29,10 +29,14 @@ properties:
       - const: fsl,imx8ulp-mu
       - const: fsl,imx8-mu-scu
       - const: fsl,imx8-mu-seco
-      - const: fsl,imx93-mu-s4
       - const: fsl,imx8ulp-mu-s4
+      - const: fsl,imx93-mu-s4
+      - const: fsl,imx95-mu-ele
+      - const: fsl,imx95-mu-v2x
       - items:
-          - const: fsl,imx93-mu
+          - enum:
+              - fsl,imx93-mu
+              - fsl,imx95-mu
           - const: fsl,imx8ulp-mu
       - items:
           - enum:

-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH 2/3] mailbox: imx: get RR/TR registers num from Parameter register

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

i.MX8ULP, i.MX93 MU has a Parameter register encoded as below:
BIT: 15 --- 8 | 7 --- 0
      RR_NUM    TR_NUM

So to make driver easy to support more variants, get the RR/TR
registers number from Parameter register.

The patch only adds support the specific MU, such as ELE MU.
For generic MU, not add support for number larger than 4.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index 656171362fe9..f2a21baded29 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -29,7 +29,9 @@
 #define IMX_MU_S4_CHANS		2
 #define IMX_MU_CHAN_NAME_SIZE	20
 
-#define IMX_MU_NUM_RR		4
+#define IMX_MU_V2_PAR_OFF	0x4
+#define IMX_MU_V2_TR_MASK	GENMASK(7, 0)
+#define IMX_MU_V2_RR_MASK	GENMASK(15, 8)
 
 #define IMX_MU_SECO_TX_TOUT (msecs_to_jiffies(3000))
 #define IMX_MU_SECO_RX_TOUT (msecs_to_jiffies(3000))
@@ -93,10 +95,11 @@ struct imx_mu_priv {
 	struct clk		*clk;
 	int			irq[IMX_MU_CHANS];
 	bool			suspend;
-
-	u32 xcr[IMX_MU_xCR_MAX];
-
 	bool			side_b;
+
+	u32			xcr[IMX_MU_xCR_MAX];
+	u32			num_tr;
+	u32			num_rr;
 };
 
 enum imx_mu_type {
@@ -264,18 +267,17 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_rxdb(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
 static int imx_mu_specific_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp, void *data)
 {
 	u32 *arg = data;
+	u32 num_tr = priv->num_tr;
 	int i, ret;
 	u32 xsr;
-	u32 size, max_size, num_tr;
+	u32 size, max_size;
 
 	if (priv->dcfg->type & IMX_MU_V2_S4) {
 		size = ((struct imx_s4_rpc_msg_max *)data)->hdr.size;
 		max_size = sizeof(struct imx_s4_rpc_msg_max);
-		num_tr = 8;
 	} else {
 		size = ((struct imx_sc_rpc_msg_max *)data)->hdr.size;
 		max_size = sizeof(struct imx_sc_rpc_msg_max);
-		num_tr = 4;
 	}
 
 	switch (cp->type) {
@@ -324,6 +326,7 @@ static int imx_mu_specific_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *
 	int i, ret;
 	u32 xsr;
 	u32 size, max_size;
+	u32 num_rr = priv->num_rr;
 
 	data = (u32 *)priv->msg;
 
@@ -345,13 +348,13 @@ static int imx_mu_specific_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *
 
 	for (i = 1; i < size; i++) {
 		ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_RSR], xsr,
-					 xsr & IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(priv->dcfg->type, i % 4), 0,
+					 xsr & IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(priv->dcfg->type, i % num_rr), 0,
 					 5 * USEC_PER_SEC);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(priv->dev, "timeout read idx %d\n", i);
 			return ret;
 		}
-		*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % 4) * 4);
+		*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % num_rr) * 4);
 	}
 
 	imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, 0), 0);
@@ -737,11 +740,30 @@ static struct mbox_chan *imx_mu_seco_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
 	return imx_mu_xlate(mbox, sp);
 }
 
+static void imx_mu_get_tr_rr(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
+{
+	u32 val;
+
+	if (priv->dcfg->type & IMX_MU_V2) {
+		val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_V2_PAR_OFF);
+		priv->num_tr = FIELD_GET(IMX_MU_V2_TR_MASK, val);
+		priv->num_rr = FIELD_GET(IMX_MU_V2_RR_MASK, val);
+	} else {
+		priv->num_tr = 4;
+		priv->num_rr = 4;
+	}
+}
+
 static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 	unsigned int val;
 
+	if (priv->num_rr > 4 || priv->num_tr > 4) {
+		WARN_ONCE(true, "%s not support TR/RR larger than 4\n", __func__);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_CHANS; i++) {
 		struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = &priv->con_priv[i];
 
@@ -768,8 +790,8 @@ static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
 	imx_mu_write(priv, val, priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_GSR]);
 
 	/* Clear any pending RSR */
-	for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_NUM_RR; i++)
-		imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % 4) * 4);
+	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rr; i++)
+		imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + i * 4);
 }
 
 static void imx_mu_init_specific(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
@@ -864,6 +886,8 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	imx_mu_get_tr_rr(priv);
+
 	priv->side_b = of_property_read_bool(np, "fsl,mu-side-b");
 
 	priv->dcfg->init(priv);

-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH 3/3] mailbox: imx: support i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU

[Peng Fan (OSS)]

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Add i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU support, its register layout is same as
i.MX8ULP, but the Parameter registers would show different
TR/RR. Since the driver already supports get TR/RR from Parameter
registers, not hardcoding the number, this patch just add
the compatible entry to reuse i.MX8ULP S4 cfg data.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index f2a21baded29..966503a5e9e3 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -1018,6 +1018,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx8ulp },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-mu-s4", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx8ulp_s4 },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx93-mu-s4", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx93_s4 },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx8ulp_s4 },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-v2x", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx8ulp_s4 },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8-mu-scu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8-mu-seco", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx8_seco },
 	{ },

-- 
2.37.1

RE: [PATCH 0/3] mailbox: imx: support i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU

[Peng Fan]

Sorry, please ignore this patchset, button pushed early.

Thanks,
Peng.

> Subject: [PATCH 0/3] mailbox: imx: support i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU
> 
> - Add dt-bindings
> - i.MX95 ELE/V2X use same register layout as i.MX8ULP S4 MU, but
>   the TR/RR num is different. To make code reusable and not add too much
>   macros, add runtime detect number of TR and RR by reading PAR_OFF
>   registers.
> - Add i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU entry in driver
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> Peng Fan (3):
>       dt-bindings: mailbox: fsl,mu: add i.MX95 Generic/ELE/V2X MU compatible
>       mailbox: imx: get RR/TR registers num from Parameter register
>       mailbox: imx: support i.MX95 ELE/V2X MU
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.yaml        |  8 +++-
>  drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c                      | 48 +++++++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: ad5c60d66016e544c51ed98635a74073f761f45d
> change-id: 20240122-imx-mailbox-243021d12030
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mailbox: imx: get RR/TR registers num from Parameter register

[kernel test robot]

Hi Peng,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on ad5c60d66016e544c51ed98635a74073f761f45d]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Peng-Fan-OSS/dt-bindings-mailbox-fsl-mu-add-i-MX95-Generic-ELE-V2X-MU-compatible/20240122-100424
base:   ad5c60d66016e544c51ed98635a74073f761f45d
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240122-imx-mailbox-v1-2-81413f655210%40nxp.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/3] mailbox: imx: get RR/TR registers num from Parameter register
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20240123 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240123/202401231557.HLHet6y7-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240123/202401231557.HLHet6y7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401231557.HLHet6y7-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c: In function 'imx_mu_get_tr_rr':
>> drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c:749:32: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_GET' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     749 |                 priv->num_tr = FIELD_GET(IMX_MU_V2_TR_MASK, val);
         |                                ^~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +/FIELD_GET +749 drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c

   742	
   743	static void imx_mu_get_tr_rr(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
   744	{
   745		u32 val;
   746	
   747		if (priv->dcfg->type & IMX_MU_V2) {
   748			val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_V2_PAR_OFF);
 > 749			priv->num_tr = FIELD_GET(IMX_MU_V2_TR_MASK, val);
   750			priv->num_rr = FIELD_GET(IMX_MU_V2_RR_MASK, val);
   751		} else {
   752			priv->num_tr = 4;
   753			priv->num_rr = 4;
   754		}
   755	}
   756	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki