[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Drop i2c-mux.yaml reference

[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Drop i2c-mux.yaml reference

[Rob Herring]

The I2C de-mux is different than an I2C mux, so i2c-mux.yaml is not
relevant and shouldn't be referenced.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-demux-pinctrl.yaml | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-demux-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-demux-pinctrl.yaml
index 2c08f2a7cf1e..dd3d24212551 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-demux-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-demux-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ description: |
       +-------------------------------+
 
 allOf:
-  - $ref: i2c-mux.yaml
   - $ref: /schemas/i2c/i2c-controller.yaml#
 
 properties:
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Define "i2c-parent" constraints

[Rob Herring]

The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an
array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. "i2c-parent" is
the former and needs to constrain each entry to a single phandle value.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-demux-pinctrl.yaml | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-demux-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-demux-pinctrl.yaml
index dd3d24212551..b813f6d4810c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-demux-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-demux-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ properties:
 
   i2c-parent:
     $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
+    items:
+      maxItems: 1
     description:
       List of phandles of I2C masters available for selection.  The first one
       will be used as default.
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Define "i2c-parent" constraints

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 400 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 01:05:51PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an
> array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. "i2c-parent" is
> the former and needs to constrain each entry to a single phandle value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Drop i2c-mux.yaml reference

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 292 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 01:05:50PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> The I2C de-mux is different than an I2C mux, so i2c-mux.yaml is not
> relevant and shouldn't be referenced.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Drop i2c-mux.yaml reference

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 552 bytes --]

On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 09:50:13PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 01:05:50PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > The I2C de-mux is different than an I2C mux, so i2c-mux.yaml is not
> > relevant and shouldn't be referenced.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Andi, can you pick these up?

Or you negotiate with Rob how you want to handle I2C DT patches. I
agreed with him that I usually take them. Except for generic cleanups or
so.



[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Drop i2c-mux.yaml reference

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 4:48 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 09:50:13PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 01:05:50PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > The I2C de-mux is different than an I2C mux, so i2c-mux.yaml is not
> > > relevant and shouldn't be referenced.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
>
> Andi, can you pick these up?

I already did since you gave your reviewed-by and they hadn't
otherwise been picked up.

> Or you negotiate with Rob how you want to handle I2C DT patches. I
> agreed with him that I usually take them. Except for generic cleanups or
> so.

Yes, that is my preference. And how most subsystems work for bindings.

Rob

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Drop i2c-mux.yaml reference

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Rob,

On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 12:06:05PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 4:48 AM Wolfram Sang
> > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 09:50:13PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 01:05:50PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > The I2C de-mux is different than an I2C mux, so i2c-mux.yaml is not
> > > > relevant and shouldn't be referenced.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> >
> > Andi, can you pick these up?
> 
> I already did since you gave your reviewed-by and they hadn't
> otherwise been picked up.

Oh... I had them in my test branch and was waiting for some more
tests before sending the notification.

Shall I remove them from my list?

Andi

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Drop i2c-mux.yaml reference

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Rob,

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 08:20:27AM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 12:06:05PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 4:48 AM Wolfram Sang
> > > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 09:50:13PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 01:05:50PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > The I2C de-mux is different than an I2C mux, so i2c-mux.yaml is not
> > > > > relevant and shouldn't be referenced.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > >
> > > Andi, can you pick these up?
> > 
> > I already did since you gave your reviewed-by and they hadn't
> > otherwise been picked up.
> 
> Oh... I had them in my test branch and was waiting for some more
> tests before sending the notification.
> 
> Shall I remove them from my list?

Because I need to update my branches, I am going to take these
two patches out. Please, let me know if you want me to take them
back in.

Thanks,
Andi