From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B55E4C6D; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 01:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706663633; cv=none; b=iVkf6NiI1qdhV1jyTypLl75tkgc3vyji0ngzAkmkDv+TFTCq3NnwSdtxBMrm5vLTxeEorJijhM9qT2r0H3ZIqbVhRhVvrH9Pjbx7qfGmxrdw/oR4vGson9dVFkbtozHcQyk56hT/qTt+Ga3B9mP6oiiGAUhhdWhToM/sbgLxs/c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706663633; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Bcw6YbTIDhbyyqhqVI8IXl8r2xanXbR9oEPkMrg3UDw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XTVaNOuD+rQOC4oxP3SMgewLsQ0Yx+pgz5k5mSI9uFCSdUsMMuRtQWgAOOeY7IakDlhwm/+o39Gq2m+yvstJPGQnzLKdlv2wqB0IOEJNct/M1RBv0TWWYJSZ3ZvK5mHh3YY7FFlzpWOtqaZxpaPtFjcFZoMcmKWVLUF1FmToPFc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=XBZSLHjU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="XBZSLHjU" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1706663631; x=1738199631; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Bcw6YbTIDhbyyqhqVI8IXl8r2xanXbR9oEPkMrg3UDw=; b=XBZSLHjUidtGkELBNWmZXs4ckGT4flr74xou7iA841u7ugqD2Vei03iD ZQfRo1Ltb4PoU3nRbIpcTi3TVN5nuSHDLPo8kIcTNLb4HH26JuRWyPnf2 gLS9XrT6KHizLD7petF0uDTUCqiiCBu31fBlWZMCARM704+k+omUsQ/r7 EnAZDCMsa5FBPzoMqVafjJj1GaNMCA2f8I8VICK67NlInIc1e/E8bHMzs MehaItsHG/kre8gjxMDjujpwncsYrVEBusgP3BWHMZnDofkKSys7FDtx1 Nuil8EZLO0LcxF+aKSyKBL6u1NWL5l3l2UopCx7whH/oqIE5fRpRxVx1X w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10969"; a="3296516" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,231,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="3296516" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Jan 2024 17:13:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,231,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="3974464" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 59f4f4cd5935) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2024 17:13:44 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 59f4f4cd5935 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rUzAb-00010E-1P; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 01:13:41 +0000 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:13:20 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: David Dai , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Sudeep Holla , Saravana Kannan Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Quentin Perret , Masami Hiramatsu , Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Dietmar Eggemann , Pavan Kondeti , Gupta Pankaj , Mel Gorman , kernel-team@android.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] cpufreq: add virtual-cpufreq driver Message-ID: <202401310804.bWt7Vf6o-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240127004321.1902477-3-davidai@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240127004321.1902477-3-davidai@google.com> Hi David, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on robh/for-next linus/master rafael-pm/acpi-bus v6.8-rc2 next-20240130] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/David-Dai/dt-bindings-cpufreq-add-virtual-cpufreq-device/20240127-084645 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240127004321.1902477-3-davidai%40google.com patch subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] cpufreq: add virtual-cpufreq driver config: x86_64-randconfig-121-20240130 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240131/202401310804.bWt7Vf6o-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240131/202401310804.bWt7Vf6o-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401310804.bWt7Vf6o-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: topology_set_scale_freq_source >>> referenced by virtual-cpufreq.c:115 (drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.c:115) >>> drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.o:(virt_cpufreq_cpu_init) in archive vmlinux.a -- >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: topology_clear_scale_freq_source >>> referenced by virtual-cpufreq.c:128 (drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.c:128) >>> drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.o:(virt_cpufreq_cpu_exit) in archive vmlinux.a -- >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: arch_freq_scale >>> referenced by virtual-cpufreq.c:38 (drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.c:38) >>> drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.o:(virt_scale_freq_tick) in archive vmlinux.a -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki