From: Nuno Sa via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] fix DT overlays when device links are released
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 13:18:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240202-fix-device-links-overlays-v1-0-f9fd1404c8e2@analog.com> (raw)
Link to RFC:
* https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240123-fix-device-links-overlays-v1-1-9e4f6acaab6c@analog.com/
Changes since RFC:
* Use a dedicated workqueue to remove devlinks;
* Flush the devlink workqueue before checking the of_node refcount
value.
The following series is the result of the discussion I had with Rafael.
To sum up the fundamental issue, device links drop their refcounts
asynchronously and that means that the of_node refcount associated with
the device will also be dropped asynchronously. Now, in
__of_changeset_entry_destroy(), the assumption is that the node refcount
must be 1 and that cannot be guaranteed given the above.
I'm pasting again the link of the first time I exposed the issue where
one can see the resulps (big splat) of failing DT assumption:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20230511151047.1779841-1-nuno.sa@analog.com/
---
Nuno Sa (2):
driver: core: add dedicated workqueue for devlink removal
of: dynamic: flush devlinks workqueue before destroying the changeset
drivers/base/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/of/dynamic.c | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/fwnode.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 6613476e225e090cc9aad49be7fa504e290dd33d
change-id: 20240123-fix-device-links-overlays-5422e033a09b
--
Thanks!
- Nuno Sá
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 12:18 Nuno Sa via B4 Relay [this message]
2024-02-02 12:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] driver: core: add dedicated workqueue for devlink removal Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-02-02 15:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-05 8:29 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-05 13:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-02 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] of: dynamic: flush devlinks workqueue before destroying the changeset Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240202-fix-device-links-overlays-v1-0-f9fd1404c8e2@analog.com \
--to=devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).