From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: Unconditionally call unflatten_device_tree()
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:30:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240202163006.GA209874-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efe6a7886c3491cc9c225a903efa2b1e.sboyd@kernel.org>
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:59:53PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rob Herring (2024-01-31 12:54:05)
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 04:45:00PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Call this function unconditionally so that we can populate an empty DTB
> > > on platforms that don't boot with a firmware provided or builtin DTB.
> > > Override 'initial_boot_params' to NULL when ACPI is in use but the
> > > bootloader has loaded a DTB so that we don't allow both ACPI and DT to
> > > be used during boot. If there isn't a valid initial_boot_params dtb then
> > > unflatten_device_tree() returns early so this is fine.
> > >
> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > > index 417a8a86b2db..ffb1942724ae 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > > @@ -351,8 +351,11 @@ void __init __no_sanitize_address setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> > > /* Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time configuration */
> > > acpi_boot_table_init();
> > >
> > > - if (acpi_disabled)
> > > - unflatten_device_tree();
> > > + /* Don't use the FDT from boot if ACPI is in use */
> > > + if (!acpi_disabled)
> > > + initial_boot_params = NULL;
> >
> > I still think this is a problem for kexec. See
> > of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt(). You see it uses initial_boot_params. At
> > first glance it looks like it would just write out everything we need.
> > But for UEFI boot, I think we need all the chosen properties like
> > linux,uefi-mmap-start preserved from the current boot for the next
> > kernel we kexec.
>
> Ok, got it.
>
> >
> > I think you'll have to check acpi_disabled in unflatten_device_tree()
> > and unflatten the empty tree leaving initial_boot_params alone. That
> > means our FDT and unflattened tree will be different DTs, but I think
> > that's fine.
>
> It's sort of scary given that 'initial_boot_params' is an exported
> global. Maybe that should be hidden away and accessed with a function
> instead so that this mismatch doesn't break something later on?
What you see now is after I did a pass of minimizing the number of
users.
BTW, I've now got another use for unconditionally calling
unflatten_device_tree() with this[1].
Rob
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240201194653.GA1328565-robh@kernel.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-30 0:44 [PATCH v2 0/7] of: populate of_root node if bootloader doesn't Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: Unconditionally call unflatten_device_tree() Stephen Boyd
2024-01-31 20:54 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-31 22:59 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-02-02 16:30 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2024-01-30 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] um: " Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] x86/of: Unconditionally call unflatten_and_copy_device_tree() Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30 13:30 ` Saurabh Singh Sengar
2024-01-30 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] of: Always unflatten in unflatten_and_copy_device_tree() Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] of: Create of_root if no dtb provided by firmware Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] of: unittest: treat missing of_root as error instead of fixing up Stephen Boyd
2024-01-30 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] of: Add KUnit test to confirm DTB is loaded Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240202163006.GA209874-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).