From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F973F9FD; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 17:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707759261; cv=none; b=FO0XOQlty+EtQGOG7kxEbojWXEDSCk2/bcCg1khSL2EZ3tnqm6dCxUzX4XeV/vkuKfHseZgyZKwHA8EqwzlkOGu29T2Ta4oCmDM9IL6vw5UAA8lrtISg48BWy0D67RZJSKevmH1+rJYBfwsKnv/7FgfDNRMfc7CyMtnlLyPG2BU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707759261; c=relaxed/simple; bh=viUeDktGlffUbGubUITq4jf7HIhZr28ZVIahNTPb2L4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bVjsRczym+ZMm8kcfykh1t0KU5IqdKmo3wz6Z12fo9MZ+TyhrakbLeJ+rXce7yd8cDVFJ34vNz3inIXaalyLy+kfkOpm9+ZcUrMDXBWe/sYZxMPPextL81hgO0PK4TZC3Q1GhZcttMC6rSRSMJNNwcDy1sTnBsozLziR4XC8rpI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gIj5PTad; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gIj5PTad" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63103C433C7; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 17:34:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1707759261; bh=viUeDktGlffUbGubUITq4jf7HIhZr28ZVIahNTPb2L4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gIj5PTad9hBa3fRiojsZ1WNwkpsstBZkTZiK3YdeztobrVFxWNflW9XbyFVv1LrkT iIzVaD9mkeho6FcDtBfX291iLnAH35nWl+Nro5LZjwt3Mnr3TSw5hCDy3+xG+rC23Q xJLV4N9xHGUm5DXEJntBil+DYOUhXs7HYTLiktLwRku+57axhNCfhh+OhSso7LNdYI wxWuMBt+Ya3IKwFih1rujFdY09P73vpwLRZc3l88IL6pqjY+xB4L27Z3Z889Ry1BK+ atPpyleg/MPckkO3YhZ0HpPcLyS4lZKKWwDdCU/FIkIyypwMNMSWeh4dG0qgo5rvBy YSQPfjx67j7tA== Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 17:34:16 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Jisheng Zhang Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Andre Przywara , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: Add Sipeed Longan Module 3H and Longan Pi 3H Message-ID: <20240212-stowaway-cartel-3aee8992cbd3@spud> References: <20240211081739.395-1-jszhang@kernel.org> <20240211081739.395-2-jszhang@kernel.org> <7ee6df91-76fa-44e8-ab81-fd4b63b58ce9@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0uyXRW8V1u8HTXNs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --0uyXRW8V1u8HTXNs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:34:36PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 05:29:32PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 11/02/2024 09:17, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > Add name & compatible for the Sipeed Longan Module 3H and Longan PI 3H > > > board. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang > > > Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara > > > --- > >=20 > > This is a friendly reminder during the review process. >=20 > Oops, I forgot to add Conor's ack... > >=20 > > It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. > >=20 > > If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new > > versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when > > provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 > > can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add > > the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the > > version they apply. >=20 > IIRC, the b4 can only help on the latest version. If I missed the ack > in v3, the ack tag will be lost. So how to handle this case? repost or > Conor gave an ack to v3 again? I think what the form letter means is that b4 could've been used to update the tags before you sent out this version. Acked-by: Conor Dooley Thanks, Conor. --0uyXRW8V1u8HTXNs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZcpWlwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0vfmAP9vnhNT21FPEZvJBVqAq/zGnEYv66OKEvr9wmbMN0SKhgEAz5hJd9Pze5gc WNJ0kmlU85hnwoHnzp0By4eM5hPO6Qw= =Vnxj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0uyXRW8V1u8HTXNs--