devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add PCIe bridge node
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:09:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222053958.GF3374@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d6c617a-bc3a-47c4-a988-b41b804d8cfe@linaro.org>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 01:39:01PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 21.02.2024 04:41, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Qcom SoCs, the PCIe host bridge is connected to a single PCIe bridge
> > for each controller instance. Hence, add a node to represent the bridge.
> > 
> > While at it, let's remove the bridge properties from board dts as they are
> > now redundant.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  .../dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts     |  8 -----
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi             | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
> > index def3976bd5bb..f0a0115e08fa 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts
> > @@ -733,14 +733,6 @@ &pcie4 {
> >  	status = "okay";
> >  
> >  	pcie@0 {
> > -		device_type = "pci";
> > -		reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
> > -		#address-cells = <3>;
> > -		#size-cells = <2>;
> > -		ranges;
> > -
> > -		bus-range = <0x01 0xff>;
> > -
> >  		wifi@0 {
> 
> This doesn't seem right, pleas use a label
> 

Why? A node label is useful if we want to reference it at the root level in
board dts, but here it is not.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-22  5:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21  3:41 [PATCH 00/21] Add PCIe bridge node in DT for Qcom SoCs Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 01/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add PCIe bridge node Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 02/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 03/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 04/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 05/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21 12:46   ` neil.armstrong
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 06/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21 12:46   ` neil.armstrong
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 07/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21 12:46   ` neil.armstrong
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 08/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 09/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21 12:39   ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-02-22  5:39     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-03-18  3:37       ` Bjorn Andersson
2024-03-18  5:24         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 10/21] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 11/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 12/21] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs404: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:41 ` [PATCH 13/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:42 ` [PATCH 14/21] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:42 ` [PATCH 15/21] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:42 ` [PATCH 16/21] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:42 ` [PATCH 17/21] ARM: dts: qcom: ipq8064: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:42 ` [PATCH 18/21] ARM: dts: qcom: ipq4019: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:42 ` [PATCH 19/21] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:42 ` [PATCH 20/21] ARM: dts: qcom: sdx55: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21  3:42 ` [PATCH 21/21] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: Use "pcie" as the node name instead of "pci" Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-21 12:39   ` Konrad Dybcio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240222053958.GF3374@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).