From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40E001361A4; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709158127; cv=none; b=cDZfvCUumjVJnNCsv+jRWGpH4JGdZPIbIO8MbQ2Zjtr6FwSXhUU/mE2bPu0i9P6kd0zRhGTbZs1tv0JTos8s5K8/X74O7JcK0EaUeS1SnmX3VqkgpDcDQyzj6WuYzwBuhhZnDPhGbG9Z89UFmu4CZFxuWEx8Sm+PaDvNyYFjHg0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709158127; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cDIB7eI+qfgraTst6qw8uLCsKY/61Gvo/qIhEP5EUZc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qv8Xq/kzhA1JflSfCBreCfTN+niV6vzgOrP2pGk2SyiYumbMbxaIHRLamofa4j6eWnus7fAMtS6x+YQI5TgKKHQJ2perLZlkv3SAk2sLNLOZaoxkZUzcGqEV1lMNic/NTViogk8uWmZoVQmXFGvtum9uPjXskXgcW8HoPgaMX8s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JX3RE+mK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JX3RE+mK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BD49C433C7; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:08:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709158125; bh=cDIB7eI+qfgraTst6qw8uLCsKY/61Gvo/qIhEP5EUZc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=JX3RE+mKdKR3cvs2/r6iCFu+RJTvicZ9D4D1E2qwq5kEnO0q5ozRlFgi6RPZbSD+n Kz4JTeGOFFE+8Ox6q084bxDjKJW4oPxfZ8wulEKEe8AV70+XjzAGUUasrk7PMcGkMz /aa9ExC4RfKqEYouEuTIsCvdNLApe6NIUDhWwzfMHYy0o6RLioqLF2/n3FYxluK5dy 1oEStdLGgcp4lNjFeAeiP7RL8w0FHuHX30YRNgOMCN7VenEGcbN5yDv3/A1oBIlv8T bpgfItgqgi/zRR0UTHiu3c5RVlCErz9/KijTaVaAkX8bLkRMs9iBLd431PSMnA/GZO /gWj+V8w2a8hQ== Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:08:43 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Johan Hovold , Manivannan Sadhasivam Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: PCIe fixes and GICv3 ITS enable Message-ID: <20240228220843.GA309344@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240223152124.20042-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org> [+to Mani] On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:21:12PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > This series addresses a few problems with the sc8280xp PCIe > implementation. > ... > A recent commit enabling ASPM on certain Qualcomm platforms introduced > further errors when using the Wi-Fi on the X13s as well as when > accessing the NVMe on the CRD. The exact reason for this has not yet > been identified, but disabling ASPM L0s makes the errors go away. This > could suggest that either the current ASPM implementation is incomplete > or that L0s is not supported with these devices. > ... > As this series fixes a regression in 6.7 (which enabled ASPM) and fixes > a user-reported problem with the Wi-Fi often not starting at boot, I > think we should merge this series for the 6.8 cycle. The final patch > enabling the GIC ITS should wait for 6.9. > > The DT bindings and PCI patch are expected to go through the PCI tree, > while Bjorn A takes the devicetree updates through the Qualcomm tree. > ... > Johan Hovold (12): > dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Allow 'required-opps' > dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Do not require 'msi-map-mask' > dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Allow 'aspm-no-l0s' > PCI: qcom: Add support for disabling ASPM L0s in devicetree The ASPM patches fix a v6.7 regression, so it would be good to fix that in v6.8. Mani, if you are OK with them, I can add them to for-linus for v6.8. What about the 'required-opps' and 'msi-map-mask' patches? If they're important, I can merge them for v6.8, too, but it's late in the cycle and it's not clear from the commit logs why they shouldn't wait for v6.9. Bjorn