[PATCH RFT 0/3] i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts

[PATCH RFT 0/3] i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts

[Wolfram Sang]

To clean up the confusing situation regarding I2C timeout bindings, here
is the series to fix up the MPC driver which mixed up clock stretching
timeout with transfer timeouts. Plus a minor cleanup while here.

Only build tested, so actual testing is welcome.


Wolfram Sang (3):
  dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts
  i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts
  i2c: mpc: remove outdated macro

 .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml         |  2 +-
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c                     | 16 +++++++---------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH RFT 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts

[Wolfram Sang]

"i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us" has flaws in itself and the usage here is
all wrong. The driver doesn't use it as a maximum time for clock
stretching but the maximum time for a total transfer. We already have
a binding for the latter. Convert the wrong binding from examples.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
index 70fb69b923c4..b1d7d14c0be4 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
@@ -96,6 +96,6 @@ examples:
         interrupts = <43 2>;
         interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
         clock-frequency = <400000>;
-        i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us = <10000>;
+        i2c-transfer-timeout-us = <10000>;
     };
 ...
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH RFT 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts

[Rob Herring]

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:58:11 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> "i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us" has flaws in itself and the usage here is
> all wrong. The driver doesn't use it as a maximum time for clock
> stretching but the maximum time for a total transfer. We already have
> a binding for the latter. Convert the wrong binding from examples.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH RFT 0/3] i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts

[Chris Packham]

On 29/02/24 23:58, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> To clean up the confusing situation regarding I2C timeout bindings, here
> is the series to fix up the MPC driver which mixed up clock stretching
> timeout with transfer timeouts. Plus a minor cleanup while here.
>
> Only build tested, so actual testing is welcome.

For the series

Reviewed-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>

and on a P2041RDB

Tested-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>

>
>
> Wolfram Sang (3):
>    dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts
>    i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts
>    i2c: mpc: remove outdated macro
>
>   .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml         |  2 +-
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c                     | 16 +++++++---------
>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>

Re: [PATCH RFT 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts

[Andi Shyti]

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:58:11AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> "i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us" has flaws in itself and the usage here is
> all wrong. The driver doesn't use it as a maximum time for clock
> stretching but the maximum time for a total transfer. We already have
> a binding for the latter. Convert the wrong binding from examples.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
> index 70fb69b923c4..b1d7d14c0be4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
> @@ -96,6 +96,6 @@ examples:
>          interrupts = <43 2>;
>          interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
>          clock-frequency = <400000>;
> -        i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us = <10000>;
> +        i2c-transfer-timeout-us = <10000>;

Chris, can you please give it an ack?

The whole series is coherent to this change.

Andi

Re: [PATCH RFT 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 120 bytes --]


> Chris, can you please give it an ack?

He did on the coverletter for the whole series? Or did I overlook
something?


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH RFT 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts

[Chris Packham]

Hi Andi,

On 5/03/24 04:16, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:58:11AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> "i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us" has flaws in itself and the usage here is
>> all wrong. The driver doesn't use it as a maximum time for clock
>> stretching but the maximum time for a total transfer. We already have
>> a binding for the latter. Convert the wrong binding from examples.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
>> index 70fb69b923c4..b1d7d14c0be4 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
>> @@ -96,6 +96,6 @@ examples:
>>           interrupts = <43 2>;
>>           interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
>>           clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> -        i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us = <10000>;
>> +        i2c-transfer-timeout-us = <10000>;
> Chris, can you please give it an ack?
>
> The whole series is coherent to this change.

Looks like you weren't on the To: list for the cover letter which I 
replied to.

For the series

Reviewed-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>

and on a P2041RDB

Tested-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>

Re: [PATCH RFT 0/3] i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts

[Andi Shyti]

Hi

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:58:10 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> To clean up the confusing situation regarding I2C timeout bindings, here
> is the series to fix up the MPC driver which mixed up clock stretching
> timeout with transfer timeouts. Plus a minor cleanup while here.
> 
> Only build tested, so actual testing is welcome.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to i2c/i2c-host on

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git

Thank you,
Andi

Patches applied
===============
[1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts
      commit: f9ccb4533bdcf31f1225a9a09805329b8020a4e3
[2/3] i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts
      commit: 401a8e9e3d697b75c2e237b9b405bb0f388dd7ed
[3/3] i2c: mpc: remove outdated macro
      commit: d0e944150446d8056a050049a8f0e98241ba6194