devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>, Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>,
	Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@amd.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
	Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:55:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240229115538.7d2f5a35@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229083953.607569-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>

Hi All,

I did a mistake in this series.
As noted by Nuno, the device.h include is missing in patch 2 and so
the patch 2 doesn't compile :(

A v3 is already sent fixing my missing device.h mistake.
  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240229105204.720717-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com/

Sorry for this error.
Best regards,
Hervé

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:39:40 +0100
Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In the following sequence:
>   of_platform_depopulate(); /* Remove devices from a DT overlay node */
>   of_overlay_remove(); /* Remove the DT overlay node itself */
> 
> Some warnings are raised by __of_changeset_entry_destroy() which  was
> called from of_overlay_remove():
>   ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2 ...
> 
> The issue is that, during the device devlink removals triggered from the
> of_platform_depopulate(), jobs are put in a workqueue.
> These jobs drop the reference to the devices. When a device is no more
> referenced (refcount == 0), it is released and the reference to its
> of_node is dropped by a call to of_node_put().
> These operations are fully correct except that, because of the
> workqueue, they are done asynchronously with respect to function calls.
> 
> In the sequence provided, the jobs are run too late, after the call to
> __of_changeset_entry_destroy() and so a missing of_node_put() call is
> detected by __of_changeset_entry_destroy().
> 
> This series fixes this issue introducing device_link_wait_removal() in
> order to wait for the end of jobs execution (patch 1) and using this
> function to synchronize the overlay removal with the end of jobs
> execution (patch 2).
> 
> Compared to the previous iteration:
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20231130174126.688486-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com/
> this v2 series mainly:
> - Renames the workqueue used.
> - Calls device_link_wait_removal() a bit later to handle cases reported
>   by Luca [1] and Nuno [2].
>   [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231220181627.341e8789@booty/
>   [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240205-fix-device-links-overlays-v2-2-5344f8c79d57@analog.com/
> 
> Best regards,
> Hervé
> 
> Changes v1 -> v2
>   - Patch 1
>     Rename the workqueue to 'device_link_wq'
>     Add 'Fixes' tag and Cc stable
> 
>   - Patch 2
>     Add device.h inclusion.
>     Call device_link_wait_removal() later in the overlay removal
>     sequence (i.e. in free_overlay_changeset() function).
>     Drop of_mutex lock while calling device_link_wait_removal().
>     Add	'Fixes'	tag and Cc stable
> 
> Herve Codina (2):
>   driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal()
>   of: overlay: Synchronize of_overlay_remove() with the devlink removals
> 
>  drivers/base/core.c    | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/of/overlay.c   |  9 ++++++++-
>  include/linux/device.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-29 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-29  8:39 [PATCH v2 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-02-29  8:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal() Herve Codina
2024-02-29  9:43   ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-29  8:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] of: overlay: Synchronize of_overlay_remove() with the devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-02-29  9:47   ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-29  9:50   ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-29 10:14     ` Herve Codina
2024-02-29 10:25       ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-29 10:55 ` Herve Codina [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240229115538.7d2f5a35@bootlin.com \
    --to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
    --cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
    --cc=max.zhen@amd.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sonal.santan@amd.com \
    --cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).