[PATCH] of: property: lower loglevel of of_graph_get_next_endpoint

[PATCH] of: property: lower loglevel of of_graph_get_next_endpoint

[Marco Felsch]

Drivers like the tcpm.c do search for a remote endpoint on different
places to be dt-bindings compatible. The search is done on the device
itself or on the child fwnode in case it was not found the first time.

This indicates that not finding the remote endpoint at the first try is
a valid use-case and should not cause an error printing.

Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
---
Hi,

I'm not 100% certain if this is the correct place but if our platform
follows the dt-bindings we receive

| OF: graph: no port node found in /soc@0/bus@30800000/i2c@30a30000/tcpc@50

a few times because of the below pr_err() and EPROBE_DEFER.

Regards,
  Marco

 drivers/of/property.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
index 641a40cf5cf3..155df04a9512 100644
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
 		of_node_put(node);
 
 		if (!port) {
-			pr_err("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);
+			pr_notice("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);
 			return NULL;
 		}
 	} else {
-- 
2.39.2

Re: [PATCH] of: property: lower loglevel of of_graph_get_next_endpoint

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:47:21AM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Drivers like the tcpm.c do search for a remote endpoint on different
> places to be dt-bindings compatible. The search is done on the device
> itself or on the child fwnode in case it was not found the first time.
> 
> This indicates that not finding the remote endpoint at the first try is
> a valid use-case and should not cause an error printing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not 100% certain if this is the correct place but if our platform
> follows the dt-bindings we receive
> 
> | OF: graph: no port node found in /soc@0/bus@30800000/i2c@30a30000/tcpc@50
> 
> a few times because of the below pr_err() and EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> Regards,
>   Marco
> 
>  drivers/of/property.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 641a40cf5cf3..155df04a9512 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
>  		of_node_put(node);
>  
>  		if (!port) {
> -			pr_err("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);
> +			pr_notice("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);

Already changed to pr_debug.

Rob

Re: [PATCH] of: property: lower loglevel of of_graph_get_next_endpoint

[Marco Felsch]

On 24-03-01, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:47:21AM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Drivers like the tcpm.c do search for a remote endpoint on different
> > places to be dt-bindings compatible. The search is done on the device
> > itself or on the child fwnode in case it was not found the first time.
> > 
> > This indicates that not finding the remote endpoint at the first try is
> > a valid use-case and should not cause an error printing.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm not 100% certain if this is the correct place but if our platform
> > follows the dt-bindings we receive
> > 
> > | OF: graph: no port node found in /soc@0/bus@30800000/i2c@30a30000/tcpc@50
> > 
> > a few times because of the below pr_err() and EPROBE_DEFER.
> > 
> > Regards,
> >   Marco
> > 
> >  drivers/of/property.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> > index 641a40cf5cf3..155df04a9512 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> > @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
> >  		of_node_put(node);
> >  
> >  		if (!port) {
> > -			pr_err("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);
> > +			pr_notice("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);
> 
> Already changed to pr_debug.

Ah.. didn't noticed that albeit I was sitting on rc4 while preparing
this patch. Thanks for the info :)

Regards,
  Marco


> 
> Rob
>