Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] riscv: Kconfig.socs: Split ARCH_CANAAN and SOC_CANAAN_K210

[Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1382 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 07:38:52AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:04 AM Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name> wrote:
> >
> > Since we have Canaan Kendryte K230 with MMU now. The use of SOC_CANAAN
> > is no longer only referred to K210. Split them and add _K210 suffix
> > to the name for old SOC_CANAAN. And allows ARCH_CANAAN to be selected
> > for other Canaan SoCs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs                        | 8 +++++---
> >  arch/riscv/Makefile                            | 2 +-
> >  arch/riscv/configs/nommu_k210_defconfig        | 3 ++-
> >  arch/riscv/configs/nommu_k210_sdcard_defconfig | 3 ++-
> >  drivers/clk/Kconfig                            | 4 ++--
> >  drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                        | 4 ++--
> >  drivers/reset/Kconfig                          | 4 ++--
> >  drivers/soc/Makefile                           | 2 +-
> >  drivers/soc/canaan/Kconfig                     | 4 ++--
> >  9 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

> This patch cross so many subsystems, I am not sure about it. If I were
> you, I would keep SOC_CANAAN and just add SOC_CANAAN_K230.

Right. That is why I didn't try to rename the symbol, and just left it
as SOC_CANAAN, but if the relevant people ack it, the chances of a
significant conflict are low.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]