From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>, Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>,
Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@amd.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal()
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:07:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240306120713.6d7b9344@booty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240306085007.169771-2-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:50:02 +0100
Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> wrote:
> The commit 80dd33cf72d1 ("drivers: base: Fix device link removal")
> introduces a workqueue to release the consumer and supplier devices used
> in the devlink.
> In the job queued, devices are release and in turn, when all the
> references to these devices are dropped, the release function of the
> device itself is called.
>
> Nothing is present to provide some synchronisation with this workqueue
> in order to ensure that all ongoing releasing operations are done and
> so, some other operations can be started safely.
>
> For instance, in the following sequence:
> 1) of_platform_depopulate()
> 2) of_overlay_remove()
>
> During the step 1, devices are released and related devlinks are removed
> (jobs pushed in the workqueue).
> During the step 2, OF nodes are destroyed but, without any
> synchronisation with devlink removal jobs, of_overlay_remove() can raise
> warnings related to missing of_node_put():
> ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2
>
> Indeed, the missing of_node_put() call is going to be done, too late,
> from the workqueue job execution.
>
> Introduce device_link_wait_removal() to offer a way to synchronize
> operations waiting for the end of devlink removals (i.e. end of
> workqueue jobs).
> Also, as a flushing operation is done on the workqueue, the workqueue
> used is moved from a system-wide workqueue to a local one.
>
> Fixes: 80dd33cf72d1 ("drivers: base: Fix device link removal")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-06 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-06 8:50 [PATCH v4 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-03-06 8:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal() Herve Codina
2024-03-06 9:20 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 12:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 13:05 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 13:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 14:11 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 14:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 14:50 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 15:01 ` Herve Codina
2024-03-06 15:13 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 21:26 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-03-06 11:07 ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2024-03-06 12:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 15:24 ` Herve Codina
2024-03-06 15:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 21:14 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-03-06 8:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] of: dynamic: Synchronize of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-03-06 9:21 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 11:07 ` Luca Ceresoli
2024-03-06 21:35 ` Saravana Kannan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240306120713.6d7b9344@booty \
--to=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
--cc=max.zhen@amd.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sonal.santan@amd.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).