devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>, Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>,
	Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@amd.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] of: dynamic: Synchronize of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:07:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240306120717.524bcd36@booty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240306085007.169771-3-herve.codina@bootlin.com>

On Wed,  6 Mar 2024 09:50:03 +0100
Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> wrote:

> In the following sequence:
>   1) of_platform_depopulate()
>   2) of_overlay_remove()
> 
> During the step 1, devices are destroyed and devlinks are removed.
> During the step 2, OF nodes are destroyed but
> __of_changeset_entry_destroy() can raise warnings related to missing
> of_node_put():
>   ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2 ...
> 
> Indeed, during the devlink removals performed at step 1, the removal
> itself releasing the device (and the attached of_node) is done by a job
> queued in a workqueue and so, it is done asynchronously with respect to
> function calls.
> When the warning is present, of_node_put() will be called but wrongly
> too late from the workqueue job.
> 
> In order to be sure that any ongoing devlink removals are done before
> the of_node destruction, synchronize the of_changeset_destroy() with the
> devlink removals.
> 
> Fixes: 80dd33cf72d1 ("drivers: base: Fix device link removal")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/dynamic.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> index 3bf27052832f..169e2a9ae22f 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  
>  #define pr_fmt(fmt)	"OF: " fmt
>  
> +#include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -667,6 +668,12 @@ void of_changeset_destroy(struct of_changeset *ocs)
>  {
>  	struct of_changeset_entry *ce, *cen;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Wait for any ongoing device link removals before destroying some of
> +	 * nodes.
> +	 */
> +	device_link_wait_removal();

Tested-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>

And no problem appeared in my tests due to the removed unlock/lock
around device_link_wait_removal().

Luca

-- 
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-06 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-06  8:50 [PATCH v4 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-03-06  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal() Herve Codina
2024-03-06  9:20   ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 12:43     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 13:05       ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 13:05         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 14:11           ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 14:37             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 14:50               ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 15:01                 ` Herve Codina
2024-03-06 15:13                   ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 21:26                 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-03-06 11:07   ` Luca Ceresoli
2024-03-06 12:48   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 15:24     ` Herve Codina
2024-03-06 15:56       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 21:14         ` Saravana Kannan
2024-03-06  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] of: dynamic: Synchronize of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-03-06  9:21   ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 11:07   ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2024-03-06 21:35   ` Saravana Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240306120717.524bcd36@booty \
    --to=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
    --cc=max.zhen@amd.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=sonal.santan@amd.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).