From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2452C853; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709921465; cv=none; b=A5/m2cxlCaouXnkjfKC16CaOE0/2cicfTweRtHWn5u9/Q1jpHONW1pwFYpXL4p71ABX6hS9IhbOI65TgGOC/vaQ1hzmihcozistdc+QQQ7rDiC3BnErlN1IcMH4l3add8mBkOZzYqLli8q0IUmfw+gKJRQf4b0iV71p/JsLcmYs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709921465; c=relaxed/simple; bh=utxrg0pNh6ZbcAIwRjF9wFUYQwIU/V2MSk12njbmDog=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=F5MXvDrbnM44S86BzPlk6SO6EETPNZ8M4C3SwyQMkMPwiwiMmmsQX76wGoEDfozEMQpW8TG9CzIpoPaj3MrTKZENf3ktTcemrRiWz1evzhUjidvHm1bXRn38cPej6MO8N7FY9S8PXtUe7qh1G+NFdnRGIyY2OvziKL0gxK/Pvbg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=edRqX6nh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="edRqX6nh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 283CBC433C7; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:11:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709921465; bh=utxrg0pNh6ZbcAIwRjF9wFUYQwIU/V2MSk12njbmDog=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=edRqX6nhErDnO5DqqLDyUiWB+Xa1bPYu1fOyMldzCNGRkJM7j5uj6Xj0oy7wcEUMl Pxv1nTFk6Kpd4s0UtQI1Nbex/DZSNKXfmiZq4Tyisy0uqInj4RgfQUwbaRYWS07kQB BpWEopMIjtLDJw+YJwkCDodi0wyVlGMRBJEXa5YKiabyGtFtluEWgbnJK/81oOAmuV xfkir0wIkOn7A82imICL0d5w9Qb8ixhaj8wzYtGl0IW4phdRR02J5xD6QlUVQWFble 2DAhglL2rJdMsgNloew200fTRKzzMZEJMggMkJ/qjEt9VdqvQyd1tD3VsO1XnRqYeu gqWebCNA6Z1Tw== Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 12:11:03 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Frank Li Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Shengjiu Wang , linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,imx-asrc: update max interrupt numbers Message-ID: <20240308181103.GA855753-robh@kernel.org> References: <20240308-asrc_8qxp-v6-0-e08f6d030e09@nxp.com> <20240308-asrc_8qxp-v6-2-e08f6d030e09@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240308-asrc_8qxp-v6-2-e08f6d030e09@nxp.com> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 10:30:51AM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > fsl,imx8qxp-spdif and fsl,imx8qm-spdif have 2 interrupts. Other platforms > have 1 interrupt. > > Increase max interrupt number to 2 and add restriction for platforms except > i.MX8QXP and i.MX8QM. > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley > Signed-off-by: Frank Li > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml > index 56f8c0c8afdea..a242f68f99f18 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml > @@ -31,7 +31,11 @@ properties: > maxItems: 1 > > interrupts: > - maxItems: 1 > + minItems: 1 > + maxItems: 2 > + items: > + - description: Combined or receive interrupt > + - description: Transmit interrupt Test your patches please because this will have warnings. Or, you can put in *exactly* what I provided because this is not it. If you continue to just toss crap at us at the rate you are, the DT maintainers will either just start ignoring your patches or require some trusted review by another NXP colleague first (offhand, not sure who that would be which is part of the problem). Rob