From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB6983F8FB; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711107266; cv=none; b=VmdCczSbk64dOVn3k1ItCUoZcpomQhJ00i5cKMDUEE86uGjrZsZnuO4dvcYfdtDWdPmgUwQFzKLQyMFuIDxcNcNxYDLB+jfm8kGaxJZRLp4/pyjFzlFXc9mFhOD0GV9KJ6rVl+QZhhNtxG8zK6EXtb6t0DIR1diZUPSZWautPqs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711107266; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OdYK8KD02d6UmxwIIam/r9XyRmX3DuDRyGM+jv+Hc2g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ipeum4vcE18EmvO3iFIoWGLcXoCQ45e2pUgL5GCr864cjEdegKVqR1nLvtqzdbs0x69QE457ycQ8DT1CxA0ozxRI06lE2bwIP6s5fPXwUF/WD4O0ZhMxb1h6YFyk7y1JD07ZjeQB9BcdyLYbsL+J5QqomjWx+4IJe+QTBMNx7Bs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=fUDSHomL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="fUDSHomL" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711107265; x=1742643265; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=OdYK8KD02d6UmxwIIam/r9XyRmX3DuDRyGM+jv+Hc2g=; b=fUDSHomLUzynr9rbREoLELXJpe0jIZb/wreoyu0RgdgmmjTuFm/OnzwS qPerlpUlfCqIFbpXI1F/vRjvlSteuRlaWB/95Fl+swRhlM+CR85KjTt9G gALMJTlHe0zheyOZ+5vHJ2Hav3iIZ7qyh0KhB/GEpmPFYXoibnuT8MNhK Byl5HvZ7H583NR6IPDSOkms+IKhAyut/xuF00aNSPvy8R+W0hiYKBsIfJ 80xB9VaW4N2f1fJQlTBu0nNG6bvBXydUYMtD3yJBzeyA99ShlBPoK34B1 L6q5qeaBpAEjDh5N+ud+t1EiCpAMWZmxX0c49J6TOtE2uMROITtkemaai w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11020"; a="6089699" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,145,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="6089699" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2024 04:34:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,145,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="52313988" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2024 04:34:21 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rndAA-000KGx-1D; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:34:18 +0000 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 19:33:27 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Varadarajan Narayanan , andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, djakov@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Varadarajan Narayanan Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: add IPQ9574 interconnect clocks support Message-ID: <202403221944.SAbczEhw-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240321043149.2739204-3-quic_varada@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240321043149.2739204-3-quic_varada@quicinc.com> Hi Varadarajan, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next] [also build test ERROR on clk/clk-next linus/master v6.8 next-20240322] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Varadarajan-Narayanan/dt-bindings-interconnect-Add-Qualcomm-IPQ9574-support/20240321-123508 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240321043149.2739204-3-quic_varada%40quicinc.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: add IPQ9574 interconnect clocks support config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240322/202403221944.SAbczEhw-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240322/202403221944.SAbczEhw-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403221944.SAbczEhw-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): alpha-linux-ld: drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq9574.o: in function `gcc_ipq9574_probe': >> (.text+0x1a0): undefined reference to `icc_clk_register' >> alpha-linux-ld: (.text+0x1ac): undefined reference to `icc_clk_register' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki