From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDAF44C92; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711393501; cv=none; b=s5e4JNqPXnv5O7L76duyI/wkTO+E9mnxUpsCgE8+b0BRZGuVBAv5LarMf9hPGMqgjCToxwo9WxLDqg6JV/9KAPZktPmnp5adsUFbH9dce6YT8d1nIARXm/STv05dkHrux3QUEenmQQmp8vzayLmif2eJNm6wKGWYvXLxvblqIFw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711393501; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PCXWRBZ3KUg5nUnH8IGx9fSZU8eB9QHi4G/KXrmD2Zk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Sp/Vq0w2DQtlOU3IloUGBJskXP7+pIkepe20BYwi454/VC6rEpc4Hl0m+xV9BPUTLLg146UdeGCz25y2e8ZQTYGBcQMNhNfiktX0I4CEVGpx1PpinZB4tF2zIP/6hEldS4TyxdrnQfChh9Z2CZcScR1mxClcJNaNUczxQrPGTac= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Xm6uYaT8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Xm6uYaT8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC2B8C433F1; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:04:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1711393500; bh=PCXWRBZ3KUg5nUnH8IGx9fSZU8eB9QHi4G/KXrmD2Zk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Xm6uYaT8FsQir59HCSm1zzR2KDNdLZQRG9aCcNX3/Zh88DVwtYNAYjaFe+XgxWnoR qtxYUziyHqAgnkyg8eZidqqDwzP8qTteuN9S4QK5zAXxX3JUMdaUsh2jeTjWVIU1Dg T2HREYnAK1e0+V9Z3Ctjo9X5XT8WBkQYRmva8kOfmGEX9D/CAGGyI4w6tASPxtKIUK LlouIXt8BIKWTJCoBvtUU0cgsmVmmx4GePPi45O3v1QEWU9iD8JyVEwnuZS+bQQqQc fIE3aie2ImuX1J6wCP9UUc4zOcsCOcaUW59W70Gb1s97pZvjaVGuauDQjQHf7l2+8t tKGKi8BPAi11Q== Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:04:41 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: David Lechner Cc: Julien Stephan , Lars-Peter Clausen , Michael Hennerich , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] iio: adc: ad7380: add support for ad738x-4 4 channels variants Message-ID: <20240325190441.6387056d@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20240319-adding-new-ad738x-driver-v5-0-ce7df004ceb3@baylibre.com> <20240319-adding-new-ad738x-driver-v5-7-ce7df004ceb3@baylibre.com> <20240324131059.77fa8e68@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:01:29 -0500 David Lechner wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 8:11=E2=80=AFAM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:11:28 +0100 > > Julien Stephan wrote: > > =20 > > > Add support for ad7380/1/2/3-4 parts which are 4 channels > > > variants from ad7380/1/2/3 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Julien Stephan =20 > > This and other patches I didn't comment on all look good to me. > > So just those minor few bits and bobs for v6 and I'll pick this up > > if nothing else comes in. > > =20 >=20 > Hi Jonathan, as a reminder, this is the driver we dropped from the 6.9 > cycle. We still don't have a patch prepared for the resolution boost > feature that may require us to reconsider some of our userspace > interface choices here. Hopefully we can get that sorted out in the > next 6 weeks, but I just wanted to make you aware ahead of time so > that we don't end up in the same situation in case things don't go as > planned again. Do you have "usual" way you prefer to handle a > situation like this? My preferences: Post as an RFC with a comment on what is unresolved. I'll still review the RFC but won't apply until you let me know it's good to go (ideally by posting a non RFC version) Jonathan