devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	eraretuya@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Make data_range obsolete
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:18:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240330151817.25c11a5f@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFXKEHaPcbRMVJTWW0Atg37jqb97JBdPoSmm3gAZEO1Q=SZm9w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 01:03:29 +0100
Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 2:37 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:03:14 +0000
> > Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > Replace write() data_format by regmap_update_bits(), because bus specific
> > > pre-configuration may have happened before on the same register. For
> > > further updates to the data_format register then bus pre-configuration
> > > needs to be masked out.
> > >
> > > Remove the data_range field from the struct adxl345_data, because it is
> > > not used anymore.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c
> > > index 8bd30a23e..35df5e372 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c
> > > @@ -37,7 +37,15 @@
> > >  #define ADXL345_POWER_CTL_MEASURE    BIT(3)
> > >  #define ADXL345_POWER_CTL_STANDBY    0x00
> > >
> > > +#define ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_RANGE    GENMASK(1, 0) /* Set the g range */
> > > +#define ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_JUSTIFY  BIT(2) /* Left-justified (MSB) mode */
> > >  #define ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_FULL_RES BIT(3) /* Up to 13-bits resolution */
> > > +#define ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_SELF_TEST        BIT(7) /* Enable a self test */
> > > +#define ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_MSK              (ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_RANGE | \
> > > +                                      ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_JUSTIFY |  \
> > > +                                      ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_FULL_RES | \
> > > +                                      ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_SELF_TEST)  
> > This needs renaming.  It's not a mask of everything in the register, or
> > even just of everything related to format.
> >
> > Actually I'd just not have this definition.  Use the build up value
> > from all the submasks at the call site.  Then we are just making it clear
> > only a subset of fields are being cleared.
> >  
> I understand this solution was not very useful. I'm not sure, I
> understood you correctly. Please have a look into v6 if this matches
> your comment.
> Now, I remove the mask, instead I use a local variable in core's
> probe() for the update mask. I added a comment. Nevertheless, I keep
> the used flags for FORMAT_DATA. Does this go into the direction of
> using the build up value from the submasks at the call site?
> 
The new code looks good to me.  A local variable doesn't carry the
same implication of global applicability as the define did.
Thanks,

J
> > Jonathan
> >  
> > > +
> > >  #define ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_2G               0
> > >  #define ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_4G               1
> > >  #define ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_8G               2
> > > @@ -48,7 +56,6 @@
> > >  struct adxl345_data {
> > >       const struct adxl345_chip_info *info;
> > >       struct regmap *regmap;
> > > -     u8 data_range;
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  #define ADXL345_CHANNEL(index, axis) {                                       \
> > > @@ -218,15 +225,14 @@ int adxl345_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap)
> > >
> > >       data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > >       data->regmap = regmap;
> > > -     /* Enable full-resolution mode */
> > > -     data->data_range = ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_FULL_RES;
> > >       data->info = device_get_match_data(dev);
> > >       if (!data->info)
> > >               return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > -     ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, ADXL345_REG_DATA_FORMAT,
> > > -                        data->data_range);
> > > -     if (ret < 0)
> > > +     /* Enable full-resolution mode */
> > > +     ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, ADXL345_REG_DATA_FORMAT,
> > > +                              ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_MSK, ADXL345_DATA_FORMAT_FULL_RES);
> > > +     if (ret)
> > >               return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to set data range\n");
> > >
> > >       indio_dev->name = data->info->name;  
> >  


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-30 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-27 22:03 [PATCH v5 0/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Add spi-3wire feature Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-27 22:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Make data_range obsolete Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-28 13:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-29  0:03     ` Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-30 15:18       ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-03-27 22:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Group bus configuration Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-27 22:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Move defines to header Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-27 22:03 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] dt-bindings: iio: accel: adxl345: Add spi-3wire Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-28  9:22   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-03-28  9:57     ` Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-28 10:20     ` Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-27 22:03 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Pass function pointer to core Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-27 22:03 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Add comment to probe Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-27 22:03 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] iio: accel: adxl345: Add spi-3wire option Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-28 13:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-29  0:33     ` Lothar Rubusch
2024-03-30 15:24       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-01 16:06         ` Lothar Rubusch
2024-04-01 16:53           ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-02 10:11             ` Lothar Rubusch
2024-04-06 10:15               ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240330151817.25c11a5f@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eraretuya@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=l.rubusch@gmail.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).