Re: [PATCH RFT 01/10] arm64: dts: microchip: sparx5: fix mdio reg

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2259 bytes --]

Hey,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:00:32PM +0200, Steen Hegelund wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 17:37 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > [Some people who received this message don't often get email from
> > krzk@kernel.org. Learn why this is important at
> > https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> > 
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> > know the content is safe
> > 
> > Correct the reg address of mdio node to match unit address.  Assume
> > the
> > reg is not correct and unit address was correct, because there is
> > alerady node using the existing reg 0x110102d4.
> > 
> >   sparx5.dtsi:443.25-451.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg):
> > /axi@600000000/mdio@6110102f8: simple-bus unit address format error,
> > expected "6110102d4"
> > 
> > Fixes: d0f482bb06f9 ("arm64: dts: sparx5: Add the Sparx5 switch
> > node")
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Not tested on hardware
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5.dtsi | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5.dtsi
> > index 24075cd91420..5d820da8c69d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5.dtsi
> > @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ mdio2: mdio@6110102f8 {
> >                         pinctrl-names = "default";
> >                         #address-cells = <1>;
> >                         #size-cells = <0>;
> > -                       reg = <0x6 0x110102d4 0x24>;
> > +                       reg = <0x6 0x110102f8 0x24>;
> >                 };
> > 
> >                 mdio3: mdio@61101031c {
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> > 
> 
> I did a check of our current Sparx5 EVBs and none of them uses
> controller 2 in any revision, so this is probably why it has not come
> up before, so as it stands we have no platform to test this change on
> currently.
> 
> Besides that the change looks good to me.
> 
> Best Regards
> Steen
> 
> Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>

Are you okay with the rest of the series, or have you only looked at
this one patch?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]