Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] dt-bindings: arm: bcm: raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware: Drive-by fixes

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

Hi Florian,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:18:35PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 4/2/24 13:08, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 09:52:06PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >> Am 02.04.24 um 10:58 schrieb Ivan T. Ivanov:
> >>> On 2024-03-28 01:37, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 07:49:38AM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [add Peter and Ivan]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am 26.03.24 um 20:58 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> >>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This small series includes a few drive-by fixes for DT validation
> >>>>>> errors.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The first patch has been posted previously in v1 ([1], and now addresses
> >>>>>> a small review comment. I think it's good to go.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The next two patches address the same issue as "[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings:
> >>>>>> arm: bcm: raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware: Add missing properties" ([2]),
> >>>>>> but this time with a (hopefully) correct approach. Patch 2/3 starts by
> >>>>>> fixing the raspberrypi-bcm2835-firmware driver, removing the need for DT
> >>>>>> properties that are specified in bcm2835-rpi.dtsi but not documented in
> >>>>>> the corresponding bindings. Patch 3/3 can then drop those properties,
> >>>>>> getting rid of the warnings.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> since this series drops properties from the device tree, does anyone
> >>>>> have the chance to test it with a recent U-Boot?
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't have U-Boot running with my RPi, so I would appreciate if
> >>>> someone could help :-)
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for taking me so long to verify this.
> >>>
> >>> I think on RPi U-Boot side we are fine. API used when accessing Mbox
> >>> device do not follow DM model and do not use DMA, but just access
> >>> device directly using this nice macros phys_to_bus/bus_to_phys.
> >>>
> >>> I build new DTB files with this patch included and U-Boot build
> >>> from the latest sources. No obvious issues on RPi3 and RPi4.
> >>> Devices boot fine.
> > 
> > Thank you for testing Ivan.
> > 
> >> Thanks you, Laurent and Ivan
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
> > 
> > Stefan, I'm quite unfamiliar with the Raspberry Pi upstreaming process
> > (despite having sent patches for ages :-)), do I understand correctly
> > that this patch will go through your tree, or do I need to work with
> > someone else to get it merged upstream ?
> 
> I will be taking those via the Broadcom SoC tree.

Thank you.

If there's a chance to include patches 05/10, 07/10, 08/10 and 09/10
from [1] at the same time, that would be great :-)

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20240402000424.4650-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart