Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD71879

[Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>]

On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 08:59:54 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 02/04/2024 21:35, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > As this chip was seen in several devices in the wild, add it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
> > Suggested-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
> > index 0b62f854bf6b..e4df09e8961c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml
> > @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ description: |
> >  
> >  properties:
> >    compatible:
> > -    const: rohm,bd71828
> > +    enum:
> > +      - rohm,bd71828
> > +      - rohm,bd71879  
> 
> In your second commit you claim they are compatible, so why they are not
> marked as such?
> 
so you mean allowing

compatible = "rohm,bd71828"
and
compatible = "rohm,bd71879", "rohm,bd71828"

Regards,
Andreas
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
>