public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Phil Elwell" <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Florian Fainelli" <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	"Jim Quinlan" <jim2101024@gmail.com>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] PCI: brcmstb: Configure appropriate HW CLKREQ# mode
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 22:01:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240404200129.3qp4qs6zklbk2prl@mraw.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403213902.26391-1-james.quinlan@broadcom.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3351 bytes --]

Hi Jim,

Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> (2024-04-03):
> v9 -- v8 was setting an internal bus timeout to accomodate large L1 exit
>       latencies.  After meeting the PCIe HW team it was revealed that the
>       HW default timeout value was set low for the purposes of HW debugging
>       convenience; for nominal operation it needs to be set to a higher
>       value independent of this submission's purpose.  This is now a
>       separate commit.
> 
>    -- With v8, Bjorne asked what was preventing a device from exceeding the
>       time required for the above internal bus timeout.  The answer to this
>       is for us to set the endpoints' max latency {no-,}snoop value to
>       something below this internal timeout value.  If the endpoint
>       respects this value as it should, it will not send an LTR request
>       with a larger latency value and not put itself in a situation
>       that requires more latency than is possible for the platform.
> 
>       Typically, ACPI or FW sets these max latency values.  In most of our
>       systems we do not have this happening so it is up to the RC driver to
>       set these values in the endpoint devices.  If the endpoints already
>       have non-zero values that are lower than what we are setting, we let
>       them be, as it is possible ACPI or FW set them and knows something
>       that we do not.
> 
>    -- The "clkreq" commit has only been changed to remove the code that was
>       setting the timeout value, as this code is now its own commit.

Given the bot's feedback, I took the liberty of running tests on your
patch series except with an extra “static” keyword. On my build system,
gcc 12 wasn't complaining about it but I didn't spend time trying to
find the right options, or trying a switch to clang to confirm the
before/after situation:

    -void brcm_set_downstream_devs_ltr_max(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
    +static void brcm_set_downstream_devs_ltr_max(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)


Anyway, this is still:

Tested-by: Cyril Brulebois <cyril@debamax.com>


Test setup:
-----------

 - using a $CM with the 20230111 EEPROM
 - on the same CM4 IO Board
 - with a $PCIE board (PCIe to multiple USB ports)
 - and the same Samsung USB flash drive + Logitech keyboard.

where $CM is one of:

 - CM4 Lite Rev 1.0
 - CM4 8/32 Rev 1.0
 - CM4 4/32 Rev 1.1

and $PCIE is one of:

 - SupaHub PCE6U1C-R02, VER 006
 - SupaHub PCE6U1C-R02, VER 006S
 - Waveshare VIA VL805/806-based


Results:
--------

 1. Given this is already v9, and given I don't see how this could have
    possibly changed, I didn't build or tested an unpatched kernel,
    which I would still expect to produce either a successful boot
    *without* seeing the devices plugged on the PCIe-to-USB board or the
    dreaded SError in most cases.

 2. With a patched kernel (v6.7-562-g9f8413c4a66f2 + this series +
    “static” in front of brcm_set_downstream_devs_ltr_max()), for all
    $CM/$PCIE combinations, I'm getting a system that boots, sees the
    flash drive, and gives decent read/write performance on it (plus a
    functional keyboard).


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-03 21:38 [PATCH v9 0/4] PCI: brcmstb: Configure appropriate HW CLKREQ# mode Jim Quinlan
2024-04-03 21:38 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add property "brcm,clkreq-mode" Jim Quinlan
2024-04-04 20:01 ` Cyril Brulebois [this message]
2024-04-30 21:02 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] PCI: brcmstb: Configure appropriate HW CLKREQ# mode Jim Quinlan
2024-05-06 22:31   ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240404200129.3qp4qs6zklbk2prl@mraw.org \
    --to=kibi@debian.org \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox