Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: add rtc PCF2131 support

[Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>]

On 24-04-10, Joy Zou wrote:
> Support rtc PCF2131 on imx93-11x11-evk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> 1.adjust the indentation.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 1. remove unnecessary status property.
> ---
>  .../boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts    | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> index 07e85a30a25f..73e0bca36b81 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> @@ -281,6 +281,23 @@ ldo5: LDO5 {
>  	};
>  };
>  
> +&lpi2c3 {
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <0>;
> +	clock-frequency = <400000>;
> +	pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
> +	pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;

Are both "default" and "sleep" pinctrl's required? It doesn't make any
sense to provde a sleep state which uses the same pinctrl state.

Regards,
  Marco

> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	pcf2131: rtc@53 {
> +		compatible = "nxp,pcf2131";
> +		reg = <0x53>;
> +		interrupt-parent = <&pcal6524>;
> +		interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
>  &iomuxc {
>  	pinctrl_eqos: eqosgrp {
>  		fsl,pins = <
> @@ -343,6 +360,13 @@ MX93_PAD_I2C2_SDA__LPI2C2_SDA			0x40000b9e
>  		>;
>  	};
>  
> +	pinctrl_lpi2c3: lpi2c3grp {
> +		fsl,pins = <
> +			MX93_PAD_GPIO_IO28__LPI2C3_SDA			0x40000b9e
> +			MX93_PAD_GPIO_IO29__LPI2C3_SCL			0x40000b9e
> +		>;
> +	};
> +
>  	pinctrl_pcal6524: pcal6524grp {
>  		fsl,pins = <
>  			MX93_PAD_CCM_CLKO2__GPIO3_IO27			0x31e
> -- 
> 2.37.1
> 
> 
>