From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B34515ADB4 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712750200; cv=none; b=p3ZtAfnFfL+sUKIzCdaMV/5xNWPHnyMWaRDUWqGp4HjVVBvaMwBW+/eIVvUIW9NCu45DlbfTvHenpIfKONnA+0Bz1o1ECCkipTgrYKMXfPJm4Lq8LP3eeme8pEzHOsnawB4NETRX3IOo0fTUre9PbFZyh/ZxzcD5yeKyDMtwPe0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712750200; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h4rJ1BWUa6Fn9iMSZK/APmjQKXECH3I4VEf2yEnegm0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ad0RCuPYPro3aGScf1eHOdrlkbx2qROaCXsmYoUPCyzAeJSE9qqDIe9gRzJNkIVtOOndHzSdnTcF00KMjbfZ8zScmyY17dmQeYU8VEDPYv2IgGWA4uD/Bs0NNQQ1aKSMdV21xs1xcX8nlOh2S2Hs5yLt/w2zja+inVcPLaNtz3Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=u3jRSI8k; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="u3jRSI8k" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61796C433C7; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:56:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712750199; bh=h4rJ1BWUa6Fn9iMSZK/APmjQKXECH3I4VEf2yEnegm0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=u3jRSI8ktYA8H+HtKWUUG2cPxJnso++uC+r0eqERopv/d/kJMUlU7hWJrMiOP6WeS gMRCr8erDT1WYe1GyiCozFdVaE1iQy+QJhV2RdjbfBjuFS+XSRL9ZTnTmZC3llJvYH PhyNSB7gTkWxVzmLtWtpQP3wzzH69RVPkdO1Rq/dKjUUHxsKh97onLu/qU1U6SMFF0 qHEjj0+dP3F/bh2Y9a/+91KqUiGUxpApg1J+Ishr/zELI+w1gh/NNi5TgTLEpINGhL sVxPI841Ig6hraZyHACZefRLXvzXml8h7dkqo9iD/eKStrI0xZS2aRBta6vaS/oC6S NP8l8A5mj7LNg== Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 06:56:37 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Sudeep Holla , Cristian Marussi , Krzysztof Kozlowski , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Update examples for protocol@13 Message-ID: <20240410115637.GA4042282-robh@kernel.org> References: <20240403111106.1110940-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:52:08PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 15:53, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 01:11:06PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > Recently we extended the binding for protocol@13 to allow it to be modelled > > > as a generic performance domain. In a way to promote using the new binding, > > > let's update the examples. > > > > > > > Does it make sense to keep one DVFS example with #clock-cells until we > > mark it as deprecated ? Otherwise it may be confusing as the binding still > > lists. Or leave some comment in the example or something, I am open for > > suggestions. > > I am certainly fine with either way! > > However, if we intend to make #clock-cells deprecated down the road, > maybe it's better to start avoiding the use of it already now. That > said, what do you think of following up $subject patch with an update > to Juno's dts(i) to move to #power-domains-cells too? That would mean > we get a nice reference for how to use this too. > > > > > Other than that, > > > > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla > > Are you picking this via your scmi tree, or which route is this going? Please take via SCMI tree. Acked-by: Rob Herring