Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3863 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 06:28:58PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 05:38:00PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > Add bindings for the MediaTek Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling
> > Resource Collector (DVFSRC), a hardware module used to collect all the
> > requests from both software and the various remote processors embedded
> > into the SoC and decide about a minimum operating voltage and a minimum
> > DRAM frequency to fulfill those requests in an effort to provide the
> > best achievable performance per watt.
> > 
> > This hardware IP is capable of transparently performing direct register
> > R/W on all of the DVFSRC-controlled regulators and SoC bandwidth knobs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> > ---
> >  .../soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml  | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..12bcc3fdfd07
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: MediaTek Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling Resource Collector (DVFSRC)
> > +
> > +description:
> > +  The Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling Resource Collector (DVFSRC) is a
> > +  Hardware module used to collect all the requests from both software and the
> > +  various remote processors embedded into the SoC and decide about a minimum
> > +  operating voltage and a minimum DRAM frequency to fulfill those requests in
> > +  an effort to provide the best achievable performance per watt.
> > +  This hardware IP is capable of transparently performing direct register R/W
> > +  on all of the DVFSRC-controlled regulators and SoC bandwidth knobs.
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> > +  - Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    oneOf:
> > +      - items:
> 
> This items should not be needed with the enum, right?
> 
> > +          - enum:
> > +              - mediatek,mt8183-dvfsrc
> > +              - mediatek,mt8195-dvfsrc
> > +      - items:
> > +          - const: mediatek,mt8192-dvfsrc
> > +          - const: mediatek,mt8195-dvfsrc
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +    description: DVFSRC common register address and length.
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > +  "@[0-9a-f]+$":
> > +    type: object
> 
> Why is there no enforcement of what a child could be here?

Seems like you know exactly what the children are: regulators and an
interconnect? What am I missing?

> 
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    soc {
> > +        #address-cells = <2>;
> > +        #size-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > +        dvfsrc@10012000 {
> 
> "dvfsrc" looks like something my (imaginary given allergies) cat would
> produce from sitting on my keyboard. Could you use full words for the
> node name and make it something that attempts to be generic please?
> 
> > +            compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-dvfsrc";
> > +            reg = <0 0x10012000 0 0x1000>;
> > +        };
> > +    };
> > -- 
> > 2.44.0
> > 



[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]